-
OJ 9/12, [1] Handwritten letter from Carl Bamberger to Schenker, dated October 6, 1924
Bamberger writes of his pleasure at working in a theater, and his liking of
Danzig as a medieval city. He is studying Schenker's edition of the Beethoven sonatas, and
has ordered Harmonielehre and Kontrapunkt I and II. He is subscribing to Der Tonwille, and
is interesting one of his colleagues in Schenker's ideas. He inquires after two Schenker
pupils.
-
OJ 6/7, [9] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 16, 1924
After thanking Violin for his touching fiftieth-birthday tribute of 1918,
Schenker outlines plans for sending out copies of Der Tonwille: he has drawn up a list, which
Violin is free to edit. Like Violin, he has lost pupils recently, and so wants to concentrate
more on the dissemination of Der Tonwille, with a new publisher.
-
OJ 5/7a, [1] (formerly vC 1) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated October 19, 1924
Schenker sends Cube a prospective student, and recommends level of payment.
-
OJ 9/34, [1] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated January 21, 1925
Cube has had to extend his holiday to take care of his father, who has been forced to abandon his
second marriage under pressure from his firm.
-
OJ 6/7, [23] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 26, 1925
Two weeks after arriving in Galtür for the summer holidays, Schenker reports that
he has caught up on his sleep and has already dictated an essay on Reger's Variations and Fugue
on a Theme of J. S. Bach, Op. 81. He will not allow the legal wrangle with Universal Edition to
interfere with his holiday, but he is annoyed about not having been paid by Drei Masken Verlag
for the manuscript of Meisterwerk 1. He has responded to a critique of his Erläuterungsausgabe
of Op. 110, in an essay in Meisterwerk 1, but will not pursue other attacks upon his work and
those of his pupils. The Schenker medallion designed by Alfred Rothberger is going to a second
impression; but the mezzotint portrait by Viktor Hammer, which Jeanette finds a superior work,
has not yet been printed. Throughout the letter, Schenker urges Violin to bring his family to
Galtür sometime during the summer.
-
OJ 9/35, [1] Handwritten letter from Gustav von Cube to Schenker, dated September 7, 1925
Finding himself adversely affected by the current financial crisis, Gustav von
Cube asks Schenker to help find work for his son Felix, to help help him finance his
studies.
-
OJ 5/7a, [2] (formerly vC 2) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Gustav von Cube, dated September 13, 1925
Schenker explains to Cube's father why his first teaching assignment went awry, but promises to
continue to help him; he suggests Anthony van Hoboken may be able to assist him.
-
OJ 9/12, [5] Handwritten letter from Carl Bamberger to Schenker, dated September 27,
1925
Bamberger is officially a "conductor" at Danzig. -- He asks how to obtain a
Rothberger medallion of Schenker and inquires after Hammer's etching. -- He reports on
Hupka's progress in Cologne, and inquires after F.E. von Cube.
-
OJ 6/7, [25] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 25, 1925
In this wide-ranging letter, Schenker commiserates with Violin about the high
cost of living, and his inability to raise his fees to keep up with it (in particular, he
feels unable to ask the wealthy Hoboken to pay more than his other pupils). He reports on
sales of a medallion bearing his image, and the imminent arrival of a mezzotint of his
portrait, made by Viktor Hammer, of which his brother Moses Schenker has bought the original
drawing. Vrieslander will write an essay about his work in Die Musik, accompanied by the
portrait, and things are now going well with the corrections to Meisterwerk 1 and the
writing of Meisterwerk 2.
-
OJ 10/3, [46] Typewritten postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 15, 1925
Deutsch thanks Schenker for his postcard [not known to survive] and hopes to speak to him soon
about the matters raised therein. Deutsch, however, could neither read nor understand a sentence from Schenker's
postcard and affixes it to this reply.
-
OJ 6/7, [27] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 15, 1926
Schenker agrees to to teach Violin's pupil Agnes Becker twice a week, as soon
as she is ready to come to Vienna. He reports Furtwängler's disillusionment with modern
music, and notes that Weingartner and Julius Korngold have expressed similar sentiments. He
is not optimistic that humanity in general will truly understand the classics, which
underscores the important of his (and Violin's) mission.
-
OJ 9/34, [2] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated August 14, 1926
Cube is having difficulty getting his father to pay Schenker for lessons given over the previous
year, and asks Schenker to write firmly to the latter; speaks of his attempts to make contacts within Düsseldorf
artistic circles.
-
OJ 5/8 [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Gustav von Cube, dated August 18, 1926
Schenker insists that Gustav von Cube pay the fee for his son Felix’s last three
months of lessons with him. He does not teach without being paid, explaining that this would be
self-degrading – in his case all the more so, as he lives frugally and teaches only much as is
necessary to afford to pursue his own research.
-
OJ 9/35, [2] Handwritten letter from Gustav von Cube to Schenker, dated August 24, 1926
Responding to Schenker’s demand for final payment for his son’s lessons, Gustav
von Cube has arranged for 250 Marks to be paid to Schenker in Galtür; he will send the remainder
to Vienna.
-
OJ 5/7a, [3] (formerly vC 3) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated August 26, 1926
Schenker has received indication of part-payment from Cube's father [for Cube's
lessons] and promise of the remainder soon. Schenker travels to Vienna August 28. Weisse has
completed a clarinet quintet.
-
OJ 5/7a, [4] (formerly vC 4) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated September 4, 1926
Schenker acknowledges Cube's note, sends best wishes, and refers to Der freie Satz.
-
OJ 5/7a, [5] (formerly vC 5) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, undated [c. October 7, 1926]
Schenker praises Cube's talent as a writer; informs Cube of forthcoming article on Schenker by
Vrieslander with portrait by Hammer; expresses his wish that Cube's father would pay all that he owes
him.
-
OJ 9/34, [3] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated November 25, 1926
Cube asks for a letter of recommendation to be sent to the Provincial School
Council.
-
OJ 5/7a, [6] (formerly vC 6) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated November 28, 1926
Schenker acknowledges receipt OJ 9/34, [3]; has written letter of recommendation to Koblenz
authorities, and supporting letter to recipient.
-
OJ 9/34, [4] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated December 14, 1926
Cube was not given recognition, and has to take an examination for purposes of the appointment. Sends
Christmas greetings.
-
OJ 5/7a, [7] (formerly vC 7) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated December 19, 1926
Schenker acknowledges receipt OJ 9/34, [4], and asks to be told
outcome.
-
OJ 9/34, [5] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated December 31, 1926
Teaching situation has been resolved; asks Schenker's advice on an Urlinie graph; will hear from
Conservatory in New Year; sends New Year's greetings.
-
OJ 9/34, [6] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated January 24, 1927
Acknowledges Schenker's reply and corrections. There will be no problem with his
teacher's examination in May. Reports on recent activities.
-
OJ 5/7a, [8] (formerly vC 8) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, undated [January 31, 1927]
Schenker wishes Cube well in his new job, offers encouragement over his graphing
technique, and praises his writing.
-
OJ 9/34, [7] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated February 7 1927
Cube reports on his careers as critic and teacher.
-
OJ 5/7a, [9] (formerly vC 9) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated February 15, 1927
Schenker acknowledges and returns Cube's review; reports on the progress of his
own publications.
-
OJ 9/34, [8] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 28, 1927
Cube reports on the state teaching examination, on which he was graded
"satisfactory," deploring the way it was conducted.
-
OJ 5/7a, [10] (formerly vC 10) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated June 1, 1927
Schenker congratulates Cube on appointment to professorship; reports that Oppel
has been appointed to a professorship at the Leipzig Conservatory, and on the spread of
Schenker's theory elsewhere; looks forward to visit from Cube.
-
OJ 89/1, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to van Hoboken, dated August 12, 1927
Schenker acknowledges van Hoboken's letter, OJ 11/54, 14, dated August 7, 1927;
encloses seven articles; responds regarding Haydn, Furtwängler, the "Appeal" for the
Photogrammarchiv, an exhibition in Frankfurt, John Petrie Dunn, Reinhard Oppel, Das Meisterwerk
in der Musik, vol. II, Otto Erich Deutsch, and an honorarium; and sends best wishes for the
Hobokens' trip to Switzerland, reporting on von Cube.
-
OJ 89/1, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to van Hoboken, dated August 20, 1927
Schenker has a reply from Furtwängler, saying that he is about to see Hoboken. —
Final proofs of Meisterwerk II have arrived; where should he have a copy sent to Hoboken? —
Discusses possible meeting with Furtwängler (refers to Furtwängler's attitude toward the
"moderns"). — Reports visit by von Cube.
-
OJ 5/7a, [11] (formerly vC 11) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated September 7, 1927
Schenker acknowledges Cube's postcards; Cube will receive the appeal [for photostats of
MSS].
-
OJ 8/4, [51] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 5, 1927
Schenker has asked a former pupil (Felix-Eberhard von Cube), who knows Dr.
Simon in Frankfurt, about the likely opening date of a music Hochschule there, but has
received little information in return. the second volume of Meisterwerk will be published
very soon.
-
OJ 9/34, [9] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 29, 1927
Cube has had 'flu; reports on his [conservatory] teaching of Schenkerian theory
(though disguised from the authorities), his private teaching, his work in composition; he has
joined the Reichsverband deutscher Tonkünstler und Musiklehrer. Dunn has sent him his
translation [of part of Kontrapunkt], which he thinks may serve classroom use better than that
of Vrieslander. He is enjoying using his radio; sends two Galtür portraits; his father has had a
son.
-
OJ 5/7a, [12] (formerly vC 12) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated November 9, 1927
Schenker thanks Cube for the pictures enclosed with OJ 9/34, [9] and expresses
pleasure at Cube's reports of his teaching, composition, listening to the radio, Urlinie
studies, and advocacy of good editions; refers to Vrieslander's planned monograph on Schenker,
the prospectus for Meisterwerk I and II, and the call [for the
Photogrammarchiv].
-
OJ 9/34, [10] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated January 30, 1928
Cube reports progress in his class and private teaching, performance of his
compositions, his forthcoming lecture; outlines plan for an exhibition in Duisburg to celebrate
Schenker's 60th birthday; has heard nothing of Hoboken's "Aufruf."
-
PhA/Ar 56, [7] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Kromer, dated February 2, 1928
Schenker asks Kromer to send copies of the Appeal to Felix-Eberhard von
Cube.
-
OJ 5/7a, [13] (formerly vC 13) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated February 12, 1928
Schenker expresses joy at Cube's report of his class and private teaching; refers
to Hoboken's "Aufruf" and Vrieslander's prospectus; reports Weisse's plan for a monthly
periodical; thanks Cube for his efforts with book dealers in Duisburg and
Essen.
-
OJ 9/34, [11] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated April 24, 1928
Cube describes difficulties with his colleagues, loss of pupils, and reactions to
his lecture; Scheuermann and Schmemann will put Schenker exhibits in their shop windows, items
requested; inquires after Weisse journal plan.
-
OJ 5/7a, [14] (formerly vC 14) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated April 29, 1928
Schenker sympathizes with Cube over the hostilities he faces; contrasts his own theory to the
approach of Riemann. Has arranged for Hammer portraits to be sent to Cube [for bookshop exhibits], and directs him
to biographical information about himself. Describes the trials of his 20s, which were surpassed by the difficulties
he faced later with publishers and organizations. Upholds Joachim and Messchaert as models of performance art, and
speaks of his contact with Brahms. Asks whether Cube will be joining him in Galtür in the summer.
-
OJ 9/34, [12] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 24, 1928
Cube acknowledges receipt of the Hammer engravings and reports on the planned
Scheuermann exhibition; reports on a forthcoming lecture and seminar, and the growth of his
student numbers.
-
OJ 5/7a, [15] (formerly vC 15) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated May 28, 1928
Schenker sends Cube an article written for the Beethoven centenary festival and suggests a
"connection" between Bonn and Düsseldorf; refers to American professors teaching the Urlinie in the USA;
outlines summer plans.
-
OJ 5/7a, [16] (formerly vC 16) Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 3, 1928
Schenker inquires whether Cube has encounted obstacles to his
plans.
-
OJ 9/34, [13] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated July 6, 1928
Cube reports on Scheuermann exhibit, and consequent interest and sales, encloses
associated newspaper article; also on recent lecturing and composition activity. He is unlikely
to visit Schenker this year; recalls people at Galtür.
-
OJ 5/7a, [17] (formerly vC 17) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated July 13, 1928
Schenker offers consoling words for low turn-out to Düsseldorf lecture; praises
recent article by Cube, but corrects overstated connection between himself and Brahms and
Joachim.
-
OJ 6/7, [39] Handwritten envelope from Schenker to Moriz Violin, postmarked July 22, 1928
Schenker asks about Violin's breakdown, and comments on Halm's avoidance of
fearful situations and on Cube's shop window exhibition.
-
OJ 5/7a, [18] (formerly vC 18) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated September 6, 1928
Freier Satz will be prepared for publication this year; gives news of former pupils and
supporters.
-
OJ 5/7a, [19] (formerly vC 19) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated September 29, 1928
Schenker has received large-format Urlinie charts from Harry Hahn and recommends
format to Cube.
-
OJ 9/34, [14] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 4, 1928
Cube acknowledges OJ 5/7a, [18] and [19], and comments; reports on his own recent activities and
plans, and on events in the Conservatory, on a forthcoming Schubert festival, and Radio Vienna. He is about to
return the Hammer etching.
-
OJ 5/7a, [20] (formerly vC 20) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated October 8, 1928
Schenker acknowledges receipt of Hammer portrait; urges Cube when in Cologne to
visit Gerhard Albersheim's parents and Felix Hupka.
-
OJ 9/34, [15] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated November 7, 1928
Cube reports his activities in Cologne, especially his work with Heinrich Lemacher, who is a
"connoisseur of the Urlinie"; reports on his compositions. Will visit Hupka and Albersheim next
time.
-
OJ 5/7a, [21] (formerly vC 21) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated November 20, 1928
Sends best wishes for Cologne lecture-series; is planning to issue a folder of
Urlinien for use by teachers, and may deposit his handwritten Urlinien in the Photogrammarchiv,
which will be officially opened on November [25]. The "counter-examples" should be taken
slowly.
-
OJ 9/34, [16] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated March 26, 1929
Cube is listening by radio to music being performed in Vienna. The two caricatures are his
fellow composition teachers at Duisburg. Reports on his work at Cologne Conservatory: success with previous
lectures, and forthcoming lecture series.
-
OJ 9/34, [17] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated April 5, 1929
Miss Edith Sauerbrey may call on Schenker.
-
OJ 5/7a, [22] (formerly vC 22) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, date not visible (April 1929)
Schenker expresses pleasure at what Cube has sent him in OJ 9/34, [16] and [17],
and offers advice and a warning: ordinary people are not interested in beauty in art, but look
for quick, easy judgments.
-
OJ 9/34, [18] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 14, 1929
Cube explores the possibility of a student of his, Erich Voss, studying with
Schenker.
-
OJ 5/7a, [23] (formerly vC 23) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated May 15, 1929
Gerhard Albersheim will leave a space in Schenker's calendar that Schenker offers
to Erich Voss; will teach him himself because Weisse may not be up to date with Der freie Satz;
Voss to contact him.
-
OJ 5/7a, [24] (formerly vC 24) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 6, 1929
Schenker has heard again from Erich Voß about lessons and shows signs of
annoyance. Has completed his "Eroica" study, and Der freie Satz looms.
-
OJ 5/7a, [25] (formerly vC 25) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 14, 1929
Voß is coming to Vienna.
-
OJ 9/34, [19] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated July 18, 1929
Acknowledges two postcards; no word from Eric Voss; reports on teaching activities; reports on
composing and sends two sonatas for Schenker's comment.
-
OJ 5/7a, [26] (formerly vC 26) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 22, 1929
Acknowledges the sonatas Cube sent with OJ 9/34, [19]; reports on Reinhard Oppel
and on Hans Weisse's recent publication success; Schenker approves of Cube's use of pianistic
diminution.
-
OJ 5/7a, [27] (formerly vC 27) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated August 10, 1929
Schenker reponds, on information from Reinhard Oppel, to Cube's question in OJ
9/34, [19] about finding a publisher; advises Cube to seek friends who will play his music,
after which publication should ensue. Schenker gives detailed comments, with music examples, on
Cube's two piano sonatas, praising them highly and making suggestions for
improvement.
-
OJ 89/3, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated September 10, 1929
Schenker increases his lesson fee by inflation. — He reports on Oppel and
Vrieslander, referring to his (Schenker's) not having been appointed to a professorship at
Heidelberg; on Albersheim's marriage, and approaches made to him by Cube and
Waldeck.
-
OJ 9/34, [20] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, January 2, 1930
Offers New Year greetings; reports on his current mood, on the Conservatory, his private
teaching, and publication plans. Describes Urlinie of C major Prelude from WTC I. Reports on
compositional activity and reading.
-
OJ 5/7a, [28] (formerly vC 28) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated January 12, 1930
Acknowledges OJ 9/34, [20], and gives detailed critique of Cube's analysis of
the C major Prelude from WTC I, including graphs; advises on additional reading and Cube's
plans to publish the analysis.
-
OJ 5/7a, [29] (formerly vC 29) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, undated [June 8, 1930]
Schenker sends copy of Vrieslander's article and comments on it, comparing it
unfavorably with Meisterwerk III; inquires about Cube's "article," asks whether Erich Voß is
with him; reports departure date for Galtür.
-
OJ 9/34, [21] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated June 25, 1930
Acknowledges OJ 5/7a, [29] and offers mitigation for Vrieslander's
non-acquaintance with the Urlinie (to which Cube has just introduced new violin teachers).
Reports on Erich Voß, and on concert plans at Conservatory. Reports on his teaching. Threat of
financial difficulties; he has offered his services to the Hochschule für Musik in
Berlin.
-
OJ 5/7a, [30] (formerly vC 30) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 10, 1930
Comparison of Otto Vrieslander with Hans Weisse. Weisse's Octet impressed
Furtwängler. Meisterwerk III due out in October (reports contents); is now revising Der freie
Satz.
-
WSLB-Hds 191.565 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated July 20, 1930
In this 16-page response to a letter from Deutsch, Schenker thanks his
correspondent for his unstinting assistance (in relation to the third Meisterwerk
yearbook) and underlines the importance of a collected edition of the works of C. P.
E. Bach. — He then launches a long and detailed denunciation of Anthony van
Hoboken’s character, referring in particular to his treatment of Otto Vrieslander,
his ambivalence towards projects associated with the Photogram Archive, and his
absconding to Berlin to study the piano with Rudolf Breithaupt; Hoboken is
thoroughly undeserving of a high honor conferred by the Austrian
state.
-
WSLB-Hds 191.567 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated August 15,
[1930]
Schenker thanks Deutsch for his careful, helpful reading of the proofs
to the third Meisterwerk yearbook. -- Tomay has assigned the autography of the
foreground graphs for the second movement of the "Eroica" Symphony to an apprentice;
these are full of mistakes and will have to be done again. But Tomay’s own work, on
the third and fourth movements, is excellent. -- In a postscript, he comments on his
entry in the most recent Meyers Lexikon, and on a review of the second Meisterwerk
yearbook in the Deutsche Tonkünstler-Zeitung.
-
OJ 5/18, 1 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated October 7, 1930
In a letter dictated to Jeanette because of eye trouble, but signed and dated by
Heinrich, Schenker tells Jonas that Vrieslander, Roth, and von Cube were unable to support
themselves in Munich and have moved elsewhere.
-
OJ 5/7a, [31] (formerly vC 31) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated November 1, 1930
Dr. Leo Kestenberg of the Prussian Ministry of Art and Education has, at
Furtwangler's recommendation, asked Hans Weisse to deliver three lectures on Schenker's theory
in Berlin, to be repeated elsewhere. Cube should take heart from this turn of
events.
-
OJ 5/7a, [32] (formerly vC 32) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated November 7, 1930
Schenker denies knowing a pupil-imposter; advises Cube to wait until after
Weisse's lectures in Berlin.
-
OJ 5/7a, [33] (formerly vC 33) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated November 10, [1930]
Discusses attendance at Weisse's forthcoming lecture in Berlin; refers to two
articles in Die Musik.
-
OJ 9/34, [22] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated November 22, 1930
Cube thinks attending Weisse's lectures would enable him to make contact with
"people of stature" in Berlin, where he would like to teach Schenker's theory, and asks Schenker
for the time and place, referring to the difficulties of travel in these "catastrophic times."
Will check up on Reichert. Has been invited to give six lectures locally, and has a concert of
his compositions coming up.
-
OJ 6/7, [52] Letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, in Jeanette Schenker's hand, dated November
26, 1930
Schenker summarizes the achievements and ambitions of several of his pupils
and followers (Albersheim, Cube, Vrieslander, Roth, Jonas, and Weisse), noting that Weisse
is the most ambitious of all of these though he is not completely at home in the new theory.
He fears that something might go wrong at Weisse's forthcoming lecture at the Central
Institute for Music Education, and hopes that Violin will listen with a sharp ear. Weisse
will give a trial run of the lecture at the Schenkers' apartment.
-
OJ 15/15, [49] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated November 28, 1930
Weisse is delighted by the chance to rehearse his forthcoming lecture at
Schenker's apartment. His Sextet will be performed at the Musikverein in Vienna; he goes
through a list of Schenker's circle of adherents who might be invited to his forthcoming
lectures at the Central Institute for Music Education and Teaching in
Berlin.
-
OJ 5/7a, [34] (formerly vC 34) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated December 5, 1930
Gives dates and place of Weisse's lectures in Vienna.
-
OJ 6/8, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated January 9, 1931
In this long and wide-ranging two-part letter, which includes a graphic
analysis of J. S. Bach’s Two-part Invention in E-flat major, Schenker praises the work of
Hans Weisse, who has recently returned from lecturing in Berlin and may be offered a post
there (on Furtwängler’s recommendation), emigrate to America (with the help of Gerald
Warburg), or even found an institute that would give employment to Felix Salzer and other
Schenkerian disciples under one roof. — A letter from Violin, which has just arrived in the
morning post, speaks of Violin’s own intention to establish a Schenker Institute in Hamburg.
For this, Schenker recommends Felix-Eberhard von Cube (in preference to Reinhard Oppel) and
Otto Vrieslander as possible theory teachers, if not Weisse himself. — The letter concludes
with a tirade against those who have caused him financial misery (including his brother
Mozio), culminating in a cynical passage in which Schenker advises his friend to look after
himself and engage some dull pedagog to teach conventional theory. In the end, he wishes
Violin luck with the enterprise, and thanks him for having helped rescue him from Hertzka’s
clutches.
-
OJ 9/34, [23] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated February 10, 1931
Cube acknowledges issue of Der Kunstwart; encloses a letter from Walter Braunfels responding to his
plans to establish a Rhineland base for Schenkerian teaching at the Cologne Hochschule für Musik; wonders whether
Anthony van Hoboken might be approached for financial assistance on this, and if so how the approach should be
made.
-
OJ 15/16, [68] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 17, 1931
Weisse thanks Schenker for sending him letters from Felix-Eberhard von Cube
und Walter Braunfels, and in return sends Schenker a letter from Wilhelm Furtwängler. He
repeats a request for information about the source of a Mozart letter that he has been
quoting in a lecture to the Viennese Society for Music Pedagogy.
-
OC 20/402 Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated February 20, 1931
Weisse describes the extraordinary success of his second lecture (at the
Society for Music Pedagogy in Vienna). He asks his teacher's opinion about his rhythmic
interpretation of the Bach's Prelude in D minor, BWV 926, and of the third movement of
Brahms's String Quartet in C minor, Op. 51, No. 2.
-
OJ 5/7a, [35] (formerly vC 35) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated March 28, 1931
Schenker put Cube's Cologne Highschool proposal to van Hoboken, and now reports on the reaction,
discussing the latter's character in so doing.
-
OJ 6/8, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated April 14, 1931
Having heard that Weisse is leaving for America, Schenker asks if Violin has
had a response from Cube. He has had a postcard from a pupil of Cube’s, Erich Voss, who
would like to know the content of Der freie Satz.
-
OJ 9/34, [24] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated April 25, 1931
Cube is busy disposing of his house and dealing with his father's estate; he is
moving to Hamburg to work with Moriz Violin after a short holiday.
-
OJ 9/34, [25] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 9, 1931
Cube describes his feelings and final dealings with the Conservatory in Duisburg,
and preparations for work with Violin in Hamburg; he reports on his two best pupils, Erich Voss
and Lieselotte Müller.
-
OJ 6/8, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated May 24, 1931
Schenker sends Violin clippings of a positive anonymous review of Das
Meisterwerk 3, and an article by Bruno Walter from the Neue freie Presse mentioning
him.
-
OJ 5/7a, [36] (formerly vC 36) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated June 6, 1931
Schenker will write to Cube from Galtür, with Mozart calling
card.
-
OJ 6/8, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated June 11, 1931
Schenker expresses his feelings about the establishment of a music school in
Hamburg named after him, believing it to represent a spiritual union of Violin with himself.
He is sending him some recent compositions by Weisse, which he finds well
composed.
-
OJ 5/7a, [37] (formerly vC 37) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated June 12, 1931
Schenker sends pieces by Hans Weisse; promises letter from Galtür.
-
OJ 5/7a, [38] (formerly vC 38) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, in Jeanette Schenker's hand, dated June 30, 1931
Schenker encloses the [Mozart calling] card, and sends an article from Der Kunstwart; he
emphasizes that Moriz Violin's new institute is a "school," not a "seminar," and offers detailed advice;
comments that his theory from Harmonielehre to Meisterwerk constitutes a self-contained whole; recommends use of
C. P. E. Bach's Versuch with his theory applied to the examples; and foretells the Urlinie-Tafeln that should be
available to Violin/Cub in Hamburg and to Weisse in New York. His eyes have suffered and need complete
rest.
-
OJ 8/5, [6] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated July 24, 1931
Schenker expresses his astonishment at what the Violin family has had to
endure, and thanks him for the Schenker Institute prospectus.
-
OJ 9/34, [26] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated August 19, 1931
Cube informs Schenker that Moriz Violin's son has been taken ill; Cube sends
Schenker a copy of the Schenker Institute prospectus.
-
OJ 5/7a, [39] (formerly vC 39) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, undated [August 22, 1931]
Acknowledges OJ 9/34, [26] and asks for further copies of the prospectus of the Schenker
Institute, Hamburg.
-
OJ 6/8, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated September 6, 1931
In this long, sentimental letter, Schenker thanks Violin for founding a
Schenker Institute in Hamburg and reflects on the intertwining of their fates through their
connection with C. P. E. Bach. He also advises on the wording of the Institute’s
prospectus.
-
OJ 9/34, [27] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated September 8, 1931
Line drawing of Moriz Violin. Cube reports on health of Violin's son; discusses his
relationship with Violin, and the prospects of the Schenker Institute in Hamburg; Cube will be assisting at
a lecture given by Hans Weisse.
-
OJ 6/8, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated September 28, 1931
Schenker is heartened that Herman Roth, once again, seems to be supporting his
cause. Schenker recommends a series of possible “guest speakers” at the Schenker Institute
and asks if there is some sort of monument or commemorative space devoted to C. P. E. Bach
in Hamburg.
-
OJ 9/34, [28] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 16, 1931
Cube reports enrollment and quality of students at the Schenker Institute,
Hamburg; his own teaching is increasingly small-group-tuition based, drawing on Tonwille and
Meisterwerk. Karl Violin is recovering.
-
OJ 6/8, [7] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated October 17, 1931
Schenker offers Violin words of comfort in the light of a misappropriation of
the title “Professor.” He also describes progress on Chopin’s Op. 10, No. 12, and the Bach
Prelude in C major for the Five Analyses in Sketchform, and his work on a document of Anton
Schindler purporting to convey Beethoven’s instructions on the performance of the Op. 14
sonatas.
-
OJ 6/8, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated October 23, 1931
Schenker has written to Ludwig Karpath concerning the matter of Violin’s
appropriation of the title of “Professor” (as discussed in Schenker’s letter of October 17).
He hopes that his friend's difficulties are now entirely behind him.
-
OJ 5/7a, [40] (formerly vC 40) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, undated [c. October 29, 1931]
Angi Elias has made a fair copy of Cube's latest graph of the C major Prelude
(Wohltemperirtes Clavier, Book I), which Schenker may use in his seminar; Cube to write thanking
Elias; Schenker comments on changes to Cube's graph.
-
OeNB Mus.Hs. 36390/1 [2] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated November 4, 1931
Violin thanks Schenker for his package. He has been swamped by administrative
business concerning the Schenker Institute, but is sometimes able to argue about musical
matters with Felix-Eberhard von Cube. He thanks Schenker for correcting a mistake on Cube’s
part concerning the analysis of the end of the C major Prelude from the first book of Bach’s
Well-tempered Clavier.
-
OJ 8/5, [7] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Violin, dated November 27,
1931
Inquiring about Violin’s difficulties at the Schenker Institute in Hamburg,
Schenker observes that there are many fewer conservatory students in Vienna, and also in
Berlin, because music teachers earn so little.
-
OJ 6/8, [9] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 24, 1931
Thanking Violin for his recent letter, Schenker bemoans the present condition
of the world, and expresses the hope that his health will enable to see him through the
worst of the days to come.
-
OJ 5/7a, [41] (formerly vC 41) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated January 14, 1932
Schenker acknowledges a [non-extant] letter, and asks for a clipping from the Frankfurter
Allgemeine Zeitung.
-
OJ 9/34, [30] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated January 16, 1932
Cube encloses the requested clipping and an explanatory letter.
-
OJ 5/7a, [42] (formerly vC 42) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated January 20, 1932
Schenker acknowledges an enclosed review and letter, and comments on [Ludwig]
Rottenberg. That music has cohesiveness (Zusammenhang) has finally been recognized; this must be
disseminated.
-
OJ 9/34, [31] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 8, 1932
Cube sends Schenker an Urlinie graph of Schubert's song "Der Dopplegänger," and offers an
extended commentary. Describes his work and state of mind, and comments on working with Moriz Violin; he
expresses fears for the Hamburg Schenker Institut. He has just got married.
-
OJ 9/34, [32] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 11, 1932
Cube reports a conversation with Moriz Violin.
-
OJ 6/8, [13] Handwritten letter, with envelope, from Schenker to Violin, dated June 12,
1932
Schenker refers to his “betrayal” by Herman Roth and shares with Vrieslander’s
letter on the subject. He updates Violin on the forthcoming publication of the Fünf
Urlinie-Tafeln, accusing the Mannes School of getting more publicity and profits from the
sale of the work than it deserves.
-
OJ 9/34, [33] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated July 2, 1932
Cube outlines, with music examples and graphs, a theory of tonal system and modal
mixture based on "the series of 5ths," "the closed-up circle of 5ths," and "differentiation of
the resultant intervals in a diatonic projection" as a scale. He asks for Schenker's
reaction.
-
OJ 5/7a, [43] (formerly vC 43) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 6, 1932
Schenker acknowledges OJ 11/54, [33], and reports publication of songs and
Ländler by Vrieslander.
-
OJ 9/34, [34] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated September 12, 1932
Cube outlines the conflict between Moriz Violin and the school authorities over
inspection of the Hamburg Schenker-Institut, portrays his own differences of opinion with
Violin, and asks for Schenker's opinion.
-
OJ 5/7a, [44] (formerly vC 44) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, postmarked September 16, 1932
In response to OJ 9/34, [34], Schenker thinks Cube right, but would need to see
the inspection before giving judgment.
-
OJ 9/34, [35] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated December 7, 1932
Cube reports on his current state of mind, his work on a Bach graph (commenting
on a graph by Angi Elias), promises to send an article on Schenker that has appeared in the
Frankfurter Zeitung, on the difficulties of the Schenker-Institut, and on Moriz and Karl
Violin.
-
OJ 6/8, [16] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 29, 1932
Schenker advises Violin to keep up the pressure on Josef Marx regarding a
possible position at the Vienna Akademie; he will do the same. He again discourages his
friend from approaching Anthony van Hoboken with an appeal for financial
assistance.
-
OJ 6/8, [22] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated April 21, 1933
Schenker eagerly awaits Violin’s arrival in Vienna. He will soon send his
friend a copy of the Brahms study Oktaven und Quinten.
-
OJ 9/34, [36] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 1, 1933
Thanks Schenker for sending Brahms's Octaven u. Quinten, expresses his longing for Der
freie Satz, sends an example of his work, and expresses concern over his future.
-
OJ 5/7a, [45] (formerly vC 45) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated May 6, 1933
Schenker congratulates Cube on the submitted work and offers analytical comments; and laments the
economic conditions for musicians.
-
OJ 9/34, [37] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated May 11, 1933
Cube, in response to OJ 5/7a, [45], defends his choice of a descent from 3, with neighbor-note 4, in
his analysis of the first theme of Beethoven Op. 26, mvt 1, with graphs as "proof"; he also defends political
developments in Germany, and attributes his threatened hunger to Violin's return to Vienna.
-
OJ 5/7a, [46] (formerly vC 46) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated May 14, 1933
Schenker disagrees with Cube's assertion in OJ 9/34, [37], that the Urlinie of the theme of
Beethoven, Op. 26, first movement, was a third-progression, not a fifth-progression, giving graphic proofs and
explaining Cube's misuse of the neighbor note. Hitler has done "historical service" in getting rid of Marxism;
someone is needed to get rid of musical Marxists; Schenker has created the tools. He provides background to
Moriz Violin's departure from Hamburg, reports on Jonas, Weisse, and Oppel, and inquires whether Cube has heard
from Furtwängler.
-
OJ 5/7a, [48] (formerly vC 48) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated September 16, 1933
Schenker acknowledges OJ 9/34, [38], and reports on publications by Oswald Jonas,
and the activities of Reinhard Oppel and Otto Vrieslander.
-
OJ 5/7a, [47] (formerly vC 47) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated July 18, 1933
Schenker reports on a newspaper article and abortive radio program about his theory, by
Theo Goos; also on Jonas's forthcoming book, on van Hoboken, Moriz Violin, and Hans Wolf; and on
progress with Der freie Satz.
-
OJ 9/34, [38] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated September 7, 1933
Cube reports on his poor health and straitened cirumstances, teaching at two
conservatories and private pupils; he eagerly awaits Der freie Satz, and reports on his
investigation of diatonic systems.
-
FS 40/1, [17] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Salzer, dated September 24, 1933
Schenker sets [seminar] meeting date and reports on publications by Jonas,
Vrieslander, and von Cube.
-
OJ 15/26, [1] Handwritten postcard from Hans Wolf to Schenker, dated January 4, 1934
Wolf sends good wishes for the New Year; he expects to be back from Hamburg
for his lesson on Monday.
-
OJ 9/34, [39] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated April 29, 1934
Cube has broken his silence; believes he is defeated: encloses letter from his employer; will try
to enlist Furtwängler's support. He is known as "the" Schenkerian; others now avoid Schenker's name to protect
themselves. Does Schenker know of any possibility for him and his family in Austria? Encloses
graph.
-
OJ 5/7a, [49] (formerly vC 49) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated May 8, 1934
Schenker congratulates Cube on the graph he has sent, and reports on Der freie
Satz and the continuation of the Urlinie-Tafeln.
-
OJ 9/34, [40] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, June 2, 1934
Quotes part of a letter from the Reichsmusikkammer regarding grounds for his
dismissal, and reports subsequent conversation with the Conservatory administration.
Encloses review of a recent lecture. Includes revised Ursatz for Bach Prelude in body of
letter. Inquires about Hans Wolf, and reports on Furtwängler.
-
OJ 9/34, [41] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated June 7, 1934
Acknowledges a (non-extant) letter in which Schenker had expressed dismay at a review (enclosed
with OJ 9/34, [40]) of a recent lecture by Cube, who explains the circumstances under which he had to disguise
the source of some of his ideas: Schenkerian theory is regarded as "Jewish rubbish," and is no longer discussed;
one has to choose one words carefully.
-
OC 44/4 Printed and handwritten birth annnouncement from the Cube family to Schenker, dated
August 12, 1934
Birth announcement of John-Carsten von Cube.
-
OJ 5/7a, [50] (formerly vC 50) Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated August 18, 1934
Best wishes for birth.
-
OJ 9/34, [42] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 4, 1934
Quotes letter from Furtwängler in extenso touching on reasons for dismissal and
articulating the importance of Schenker's theory; Cube describes the impact of this letter on his
Director. The names of Schenker, Halm, and Kurth were deleted from a recent text of his, and
censorship has been imposed. Describes his own recent activities. Outlines his geometric theory of the
diatonic components of tonality. Encloses photograph of his wife and son; describes hardships. Denies
rumors that he has cheated Moriz Violin, and refers to the resulting backlash on him: Violin has a
"complex", feels downtrodden by everyone.
-
OJ 5/18, 59 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated October 16, 1934
Schenker cautions Jonas that he detects "something afoot" with Hoboken and his
wife. — Mentions Hans Wolf's reentry problems and reports on German students coming to him.
—An article on Schenker has been included in Spanish Enciclopedia universale. —Reports on
Zuckerkandl, Breisach, von Cube, and Weisse.
-
OJ 5/18, 60 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated October 25, 1934
Schenker thanks Jonas for the assistance he has given Hans Wolf, and reports
that Furtwängler has intervened on Wolf's behalf, and also helped von Cube obtain a position
in Hamburg; Hoboken "doesn't want to drop" Jonas.
-
OJ 5/7a, [51] (formerly vC 51) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated October 26, 1934
Acknowledges OC 9/34, [42], and its contents; comments on the "youth of today" – organic
connection is the best thing for them; asks publisher of Schäfke book. Once Der freie Satz is in
print, he will give his mind to the continuation of the Urlinie-Tafeln. Schenker's name is included in
the Spanish Enciclicopedia universale.
-
OC 44/8 Handwritten postcard from Cube to Schenker, dated October 29, 1934
Cube gives the publisher of Schäfke's Geschichte der Musikästhetik, and reports the prospect of a
permanent position.