-
OJ 11/42, [6] Handwritten postcard from Maximilian Harden to Schenker, dated October 19,
1893
Harden thanks Schenker for sending an [unidentified] article with a lighter
tone than some of Schenker's other work.
-
OJ 9/6, [1] Handwritten letter from Eugen d'Albert to Schenker, dated February 19,
1894
Eugen d'Albert has instructed his publishers to send Schenker all his
compositions, and asks Schenker to write about them in Die Zukunft.
-
Sbb B II 4421 Handwritten letter with envelope from Schenker to Busoni, postmarked March 6,
1898
Schenker pleads to have a few minutes of Busoni's time, and informs him that
Breitkopf & Härtel's acceptance of his Fantasie is almost secured.
-
OC 52/24 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated August 25, 1908
Hertzka explains that the last-minute change to Beitrag zur Ornamentik
requested by Schenker would be exorbitantly expensive.
-
WSLB 35 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), January 8, 1909
In a letter "ironic in tone" Schenker offers alternative editors for WTC Bk
II. He outlines the work that he has in hand, and regrets his unhappy experience with UE
over Beitrag zur Ornamentik.
-
OC 52/402 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Schenker, dated March 21, 1909
Hertzka raises several possibilities for amplifying the
Instrumentations-Tabelle, and calls for a meeting.
-
OC 52/62 Typewritten letter from Hertzka (UE) to Moriz Violin, dated January 19,
1911
Hertzka regrets having missed Moriz Violin's concert, and asks for a
list of recipients for his booklet Ueber das Continuo.
-
OJ 6/5, [1] Handwritten double letter from Heinrich Schenker and Jenny Kornfeld to Moriz Violin,
dated August 18, 1911
Heinrich and Jenny Kornfeld are in the Sulden Valley, Tyrol. Heinrich writes
about his planned refutation of the theories of Hugo Riemann and the need to establish his own
theories in Germany; — and about separate accommodation arrangements for Jenny. Jenny writes
more somberly about the coming autumn and its difficulties.
-
WSLB 79 Handwritten letter from Schenker to UE, dated August 18, 1911
Schenker provides requested personal data.
-
WSLB 81 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated September 14,
1911
Schenker demands to know whether UE is interested in publishing his planned
edition of the last five Beethoven piano sonatas; -- Inquires how the proofs of Beethovens
neunte Sinfonie stand; And draws attention to the favorable sales of Kontrapunkt
1.
-
WSLB 87 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 3, 1911
Schenker explains that the music examples without [key] signatures in
Beethovens neunte Sinfonie are direct transcriptions from Beethoven's sketch materials. --
He approves the use of a quotation from a D'Albert letter for publicity
purposes.
-
WSLB 88 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated December 6, 1911
Schenker gives instructions as to how measure number should be displayed in
the analysis sections of his monograph Beethoven's neunte Sinfonie.
-
WSLB 100 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated March 13, 1912
Schenker proposes that his book Beethovens neunte Sinfonie and the edited full
orchestral score be published as separate volumes, and promises the additional revised text
of his Instrumentations-Tabelle the next day.
-
OJ 13/37, 14 Handwritten letter from Rudorff to Schenker, dated July 18, 1912
Rudorff writes admiringly of Schenker's new book, Beethovens Neunte Sinfonie;
— He responds to Schenker's question about the whereabouts of the autograph manuscript of
Beethoven's Piano Sonata in E major, Op. 109, speaking also of his own former editorial
work.
-
WSLB 143 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated November 27[–28],
1912
Schenker requests another copy of Beethoven Op. 109, and lists the sources he
has now consulted, the communications with scholars, the cost and time involved, proclaims
the "spectacular" findings made, and the incompetence of all previous editors
unmasked.
-
OJ 10/3, [7] Handwritten letter from Otto Erich Deutsch Deutsch to Schenker, dated January 16,
1920
Deutsch will write to the Beethoven House in Bonn to seek permission to
reproduce the manuscript of the "Moonlight" Sonata. He suggests using the first edition as
the source for the missing opening and closing bars, and asks Schenker to refrain from
polemics in his commentary. Copies of the manuscripts of Beethoven's piano sonatas Opp. 28,
109, 110 and 111 should not be difficult to obtain, and he has made inquiries regarding the
manuscripts of Beethoven's Piano Sonata Op. 106 and Mozart's A minor Rondo K.
511.
-
OC 52/450 Typed letter from Kalmus (UE) to Schenker, dated October 25, 1920
Kalmus confirms receipt of EA Op. 101 manuscript; he inquires about the
publication sequence between EA Op. 101 and the first issue of the Kleine Bibliothek, and about
the autograph manuscript for which Schenker is waiting.
-
OJ 14/1, [4] Handwritten postcard from Felix Hupka to Schenker, dated February 18, 1921
In Leipzig Hupka reports that he has met Karl Straube, who inquired as to the
possibility of tempting Schenker to move to Leipzig, and also Alfred Heuss and Walter
Niemann.
-
OC B/152 Handwritten postcard from Wilhelm Altmann to Schenker, dated June 30,
1921
Altmann reports on holdings of Handel keyboard works edition
(1702).
-
OJ 8/4, [7] Handwritten picture postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 6, 1921
In anticipation of preparing an edition of Handel's keyboard works, Schenker asks
Violin for the address of a library in Hamburg that would be likely to have an early print or
handwritten copy of Handel's first book of Suites.
-
OJ 10/3, [28] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated February 14, 1922
Deutsch offers to provide several books to Schenker instead of two or three hardback copies of the
"Moonlight" Sonata edition, and then details several misprints and factual errors in Romain Rolland's biography
of Beethoven.
-
OJ 8/4, [15] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated September 10, 1922
Hearing of the Violins' son Karl's recent illness, Schenker sends his sympathy,
then reports on his financial troubles. His application for a post at the University of Leipzig
was received without enthusiasm, on the grounds that he is "more an artist than a
scholar."
-
OJ 14/45, [16] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 13, 1922
Violin reports briefly about his son's health, then goes into the practical
issues arising from Schenker's active search for a post at a German music institute.
-
DLA 69.930/10 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated September 25, 1922
Acknowledges OJ 11/35, 20 and composition; expects to be able to comment on
Halm's Klavierübung in Tonwille 4; reports Leipzig University's decision not to appoint him;
speculates on the impact of Kontrapunkt 2 and Der freie Satz; public difficulty in accepting
Urgesetze. — Aristide Briand: The importance of being well-read on a topic before commenting in
public: Schoenberg and Reger; newspapers. — Maximilian Harden: although faithful to Schenker,
Harden had not mastered the topics on which he wrote. — National Govenment: Schenker's
publishing plans, including "The Future of Humanity": man's anthropomorphic thinking is a
delusion, he needs to adapt to nature, to return to a primitive state, to abandon "development"
and "progress" and return to primordial laws; inferior man wants to "govern" (bowel wants to
become brain); Schenker deplores "artifice" (French) as against nature (German). — Things
French: praises German superiority over French in its joy of work. — Higher Plane: the German
should not abase himself before the Frenchman.
-
OJ 12/59, [1] Handwritten letter from Siegfried Fritz Müller to Schenker, October 31,
1922
Siegfried Fritz Müller suspends his lessons with Schenker on account of his
father's financial circumstances.
-
DLA 69.930/11 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated November 2, 1922
Schenker acknowledges receipt of two booklets on youth and the new republic,
returns them, comments on them critically: idealistic German democrats desire maximal
remuneration with minimal work; illustrates point by difficulties with maids in Schenker
household; German democrats naively overestimate social and intellectual status of non-German
commoners (French, British, American); Schenker decries cosmopolitanism and those Germans who
advocate individuality at the expense of society; Schenker praises the fascists as countering
communism and social leveling, compares Mussolini's Italy favorably with present-day
Germany.
-
OJ 6/7, [6] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 20,
1923
Schenker describes his efforts to make Der Tonwille more widely read, through its
distribution by his pupils and its display in music shop windows. He needs more help from pupils
and friends with the dissemination of his work, but complains that Hans Weisse has let him down
on more than one occasion by not writing about his work. Finally, he asks Violin’s advice about
whether he should accept an invitation to speak at a conference in Leipzig, or whether he should
simply stay at home and continue to write.
-
OJ 10/1, [78] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated August 23, 1923
Dahms has received Tonwille 4 but not yet examined it. — Has deferred work on
his Haydn book because of financial problems over Musik des Südens and poor take-up of
subscriptions. — Debates whether to attend the Leipzig musicology conference. — Comments on
German politics as the occupation of the Ruhr unfolds, and compares German attitudes with
Italian.
-
OC 12/7-9 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker dated November 6‒10, 1923
Halm has sent the published score of a string quartet to Schenker. —Patronage has
enabled him to publish three volumes of compositions; reports on current and past composition
activities and publications. —Discusses what he has learned from Schenker's theories, and
questions whether it would be a fault were Bruckner's symphonies not to contain the Urlinie;
Halm's book on Bruckner's symphonies has gone into its second edition. —Halm suspects that
Schenker may not "agree with" his compositions, and asks whether Schenker wishes to receives
further scores. —Halm considers socialism a "historical necessity."
-
OJ 14/45, [36] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated October 22, 1924
In the process of arranging for copies of Der Tonwille to be distributed, Violin
discovers that a pupil of his paid twice as much for one issue as the marked price in Austria.
He has made some inquiries into this matter, and asks Schenker what an issue currently costs in
Austria. There are no respectable music institutions in Hamburg, so Violin will distribute
copies there personally.
-
OJ 6/7, [10] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 26, 1924
Schenker names ten universities that should receive complimentary copies of Der
Tonwille, explaining that university music departments (Seminare) are more suitable recipients
than conservatories and other types of music schools. With 1924 coming to an end, he will resign
from UE and shift publication of Der Tonwille to Piper or Drei-Masken Verlag in Munich. The
latter have agreed to publish his study of Beethoven's Sonata Op. 106
-
OJ 14/45, [39] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated December 10, 1924
This somewhat cryptic letter, possibly relating to a subscription order for Der
Tonwille, was sent with an enclosure that required some interpretation or action on the part of
Schenker. Violin also reports that the music department at the University of Berlin has
received, with gratitude, the copies of Der Tonwille.
-
OC 54/11 Typewritten postcard from Otto Vrieslander to Schenker, dated January 19,
1925
Vrieslander thanks Schenker for Tonwille 10, remarks about negotiations with
Universal Edition and Drei Masken Verlag, and promises to send him an offprint of his recent
essay on C. P. E. Bach.
-
OJ 9/12, [3] Handwritten letter from Carl Bamberger to Schenker, dated February 23,
1925
As a follow-up to his previous letter, Bamberger gives a full account of the
number of subscriptions to Der Tonwille that he has either instigated himself or encouraged
others to take on.
-
OJ 6/7, [21] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 16, 1925
Making preparations with his solicitor for the legal action against Universal
Edition, Schenker asks Violin to find out whether Max Temming paid for the additional
subscriptions to Der Tonwille directly through Albert Gutmann in Vienna, or through the firm of
Hofmeister in Leipzig. He is nearing completion of the contents of the first Meisterwerk
yearbook and asks Violin whether he has yet made summer plans and whether these might include a
trip to Galtür.
-
FS 40/27, [1] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 12, 1925
Weisse has come across a letter from Haydn to Carl Friedrich Zelter expressing
gratitude and admiration for Zelter's analysis of "The Representation of Chaos" from The
Creation, and thinks that it might be worth looking up Zelter's work in connection with
Schenker's forthcoming study of the same work.
-
OC B/192 Two typewritten letters from Wilhelm Altmann to Schenker, dated June 9,
1926
Letter 1: Altmann replies to Schenker's inquiry about manuscripts of two
Mozart symphonies. Letter 2: Altmann gives his summer travel plans; delay in publishing
article about Schenker in Die Musik; advice for Weisse over choice of
publisher.
-
OJ 5/7a, [10] (formerly vC 10) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated June 1, 1927
Schenker congratulates Cube on appointment to professorship; reports that Oppel
has been appointed to a professorship at the Leipzig Conservatory, and on the spread of
Schenker's theory elsewhere; looks forward to visit from Cube.
-
Sbb 55 Nachl. 13, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Furtwängler, dated July 3, 1927
Schenker recommends Oppel's Mass, and commends Anthony van Hoboken to
Furtwängler.
-
OJ 11/16, [6] Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated July 18, 1927
Furtwängler mentions several mutual acquaintances, and hopes to see Schenker in
Vienna.
-
OJ 6/7, [35] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated August 5, 1927
In a wide-ranging letter, Schenker underscores the importance of his friend's
taking a holiday, and tries to persuade him to visit him in Galtür. There he was visited by
Reinhard Oppel, who has been appointed to a theory post at the Leipzig Conservatory, where
he will teach from Schenker's texts. He comments at length on the decline of society, as
exemplified by the July Revolt. The second Meisterwerk volume has gone to the bookbinders;
until it is published, he will be working on Der freier Satz.
-
OJ 89/1, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to van Hoboken, dated August 12, 1927
Schenker acknowledges van Hoboken's letter, OJ 11/54, 14, dated August 7, 1927;
encloses seven articles; responds regarding Haydn, Furtwängler, the "Appeal" for the
Photogrammarchiv, an exhibition in Frankfurt, John Petrie Dunn, Reinhard Oppel, Das Meisterwerk
in der Musik, vol. II, Otto Erich Deutsch, and an honorarium; and sends best wishes for the
Hobokens' trip to Switzerland, reporting on von Cube.
-
OJ 11/54, [15] Handwritten letter from van Hoboken to Schenker, dated August 28, 1927
Hoboken reports on meeting with Furtwängler regarding the Photogrammarchiv, and
expresses the hope that it will be possible to interest Furtwängler in performance according to
the sources in the Archive; he encloses the final version of the "Aufruf" for the Archive, and
discusses negotiations with the Austrian National Library and Ministry of Education. — Comments
on Oppel's plan to teach in Leipzig. — Agrees to Schenker's lesson plan and fee for 1927/28. —
Describes his travel plans, which include meetings with Louis Koch in Frankurt, Ludwig
Schiedermair in Bonn, contact with John Petrie Dunn in England, C. S. Terry in Scotland, and
Maurice Cauchie in Paris, and photographing [of sources] at the [Paris] Conservatory.
-
OJ 11/54, [18] Handwritten letter from van Hoboken to Schenker, dated September 18, 1927
Van Hoboken reports on his visit to John Petrie Dunn: his career, his grasp of
Schenker's theory, his situation at Edinburgh University, his publications. — Tomorrow he is to
visit C. S. Terry.
-
OJ 10/3, [70] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 11,
1927
Deutsch has seen Otto Vrieslander, who surprisingly did not mention the recent
publication of his songs. He explains how different early print-runs of Beethoven’s works
may display telling differences, and how parallel publications in different cities could
sometimes show changes attributable to the composer (as is typically found in
Chopin).
-
OJ 5/7a, [21] (formerly vC 21) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated November 20, 1928
Sends best wishes for Cologne lecture-series; is planning to issue a folder of
Urlinien for use by teachers, and may deposit his handwritten Urlinien in the Photogrammarchiv,
which will be officially opened on November [25]. The "counter-examples" should be taken
slowly.
-
OJ 11/54, [25] Typed letter from Hoboken to Schenker, dated March 27, 1929
Hoboken has broken off his friendship with Otto Vrieslander after discovering
that the latter has been cheating him.
-
OJ 9/34, [19] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated July 18, 1929
Acknowledges two postcards; no word from Eric Voss; reports on teaching activities; reports on
composing and sends two sonatas for Schenker's comment.
-
OJ 10/3, [105] Handwritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated August 21, 1929
In this long letter, Deutsch seeks to explain Vrieslander’s behavior with
regard to the purchase of materials from an unscrupulous antiquarian dealer, and also to
account for Hoboken’s treatment of Vrieslander as a consequence. --- He accepts that funds
to set up a journal linked to the Photogram Archive are not unlimited, but understands why
Schenker cannot devote as much of his own time to the project as Hoboken might expect. ---
He describes Hoboken as a childish character, with little understanding of the world of
ordinary people, who might nevertheless ultimately produce a good piece of
scholarship.
-
OJ 89/3, [10] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated September 18, 1929
Schenker acknowledges check; — comments on Hoboken's work on a Chopin Etude; —
discusses an approach by Vrieslander; — explains how the possibility of a professorship at
Heidelberg had come about.
-
OJ 12/50, [4] Handwritten letter from Bernhard Martin to Schenker, dated October 31,
1929
Bernhard Martin sends Schenker graphings of a Mendelssohn Lied ohne Worte and
a J. S. Bach Kleines Präludium. -- He describes the duplicated and missing pages in his
misbound copy of Schenker's Harmonielehre. -- He suggests a correction to Schenker's use of
the term "portamento." -- Having read Otto Vrieslander's biography of C. P. E. Bach, he
proposes to perform a cantata by the latter and describes the concert program in which it
will feature.
-
OJ 14/45, [81] Handwritten letter from Violin to Schenker, dated December 19, 1929
Violin has two possible publishers for the "Eroica" monograph. One of these he
names as Rather in Leipzig, which has recently bought up Simrock. The other, Breitkopf &
Härtel, has been suggested by Furtwängler, who believes that the proposal would be supported
by Karl Straube. Violin also considers the possibility replying to a recent article by
Schoenberg.
-
OJ 6/7, [45] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 23, 1929
Schenker, expressing misgivings about the medical profession, nonetheless
hopes that Karl Violin's impending operation is successful. He is still awaiting news about
a publisher for the "Eroica" monograph; Furtwängler's illness has delayed some lines of
enquiry, and Hertzka (at Universal Edition) has not been cooperative.
-
OC 54/297 Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated April 19, 1930
Furtwängler has forwarded Schenker's letter on to Straube for direct
reply.
-
OC 54/298 Typewritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, dated May 30, 1930
Furtwängler is angry at Straube's reply, and may sound out Max Hesse — He has
resigned his Vienna position.
-
OC 54/305 Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated June 19, 1930
A new print of works by C. P. E. Bach has arrived at Hoboken’s; Deutsch would
like Schenker to look at it. -- He advises Schenker to make corrections to Tomay’s
calligraphy [of the voice-leading graphs] as soon as they are ready, and not to wait until
September, if the "Eroica" monograph is to be published by the end of the
year.
-
OC 54/299-300 Handwritten letter from Furtwängler to Schenker, June 26, 1930
Furtwängler reports on his meeting with Breitkopf &
Härtel.
-
WSLB-Hds 191.568 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Deutsch, dated August 23, 1930
Schenker is sending Deutsch copies of letters written by Leo Kestenberg
praising his theories for their practical application to composition and
performance, noting that Furtwängler is championing his cause everywhere. -- He then
launches into a tirade against the city of Vienna for snubbing him and his
work.
-
PhA/Ar 36, [1] Carbon copy of a typewritten letter from Anthony van Hoboken to Heinrich Schenker,
dated September 15, 1930
Hoboken sends his scoring of a C. P. E. Bach harpsichord concerto for Schenker to
check in connection with a planned new collected edition of the works of that
composer.
-
OJ 5/7a, [33] (formerly vC 33) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated November 10, [1930]
Discusses attendance at Weisse's forthcoming lecture in Berlin; refers to two
articles in Die Musik.
-
OJ 6/8, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated September 28, 1931
Schenker is heartened that Herman Roth, once again, seems to be supporting his
cause. Schenker recommends a series of possible “guest speakers” at the Schenker Institute
and asks if there is some sort of monument or commemorative space devoted to C. P. E. Bach
in Hamburg.
-
OJ 5/7a, [43] (formerly vC 43) Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Cube, dated July 6, 1932
Schenker acknowledges OJ 11/54, [33], and reports publication of songs and
Ländler by Vrieslander.
-
OJ 89/5, [4] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Hoboken, dated August 5, 1932
The Ganche edition is much worse than Hoboken has said. Reports on Vrieslander
publication.
-
OJ 12/6, [19] Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker, dated January 28, 1933
Jonas still has no response from Hoboken re: his Einführung; encloses four
essays; reports on forthcoming article, his teaching and advocacy of critical editions,
planned radio lectures and performance, and other work.
-
OJ 5/7a, [46] (formerly vC 46) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated May 14, 1933
Schenker disagrees with Cube's assertion in OJ 9/34, [37], that the Urlinie of the theme of
Beethoven, Op. 26, first movement, was a third-progression, not a fifth-progression, giving graphic proofs and
explaining Cube's misuse of the neighbor note. Hitler has done "historical service" in getting rid of Marxism;
someone is needed to get rid of musical Marxists; Schenker has created the tools. He provides background to
Moriz Violin's departure from Hamburg, reports on Jonas, Weisse, and Oppel, and inquires whether Cube has heard
from Furtwängler.
-
OJ 5/7a, [47] (formerly vC 47) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated July 18, 1933
Schenker reports on a newspaper article and abortive radio program about his theory, by
Theo Goos; also on Jonas's forthcoming book, on van Hoboken, Moriz Violin, and Hans Wolf; and on
progress with Der freie Satz.
-
OJ 5/18, 41 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated April 23, 1934
Free Composition is completed. Schenker is pleased that Hoboken has come
round; — he gives Weisse's address; — Schenker has ordered five copies of Jonas's book; — he
reports that Salzer has completed a new book; — questions Jonas about his new plan, but
welcomes it; — Goos may not realize that Schenker is a Jew.
-
OJ 5/18, 47 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Jonas, dated July 22, 1934
Schenker praises Jonas's book highly; gives Hoboken's current address; —
Furtwängler has written a recommendation for Moriz Violin, who would like go to Jerusalem;
asks whether Vrieslander and Oppel are subscribers. — Comments on Bayreuth and
Wagner.
-
OC 44/9 Handwritten letter from Jonas to Schenker dated October 27, 1934
Jonas acknowledges OJ 5/18, 59 and 60; Hoboken has no reason to complain about
his behaviour. — As a result of Hoboken's distribution of complimentary copies, Jonas has
received letters of appreciation. —Reacts critically to Willi Reich and his magazine 23. —
Describes plans for forthcoming events in Hamburg.
-
OJ 10/18, [13] Handwritten letter from Elias to Jeanette Schenker dated August 1, 1935
Jeanette Schenker, currently in Hofgastein, has decided where to live in the
future; that involves leaving Keilgasse. — Elias supports Jeanette in her view of a new
edition of Harmonielehre. — Elias is surprised to hear the plan for a Schenker Institute in
Vienna. — She regrets that Schenker's aphorisms will not be published by Ungar. — She has
been unable to meet with Moriz Violin regarding the "Appassionata" Sonata. — She is reading
Der freie Satz.