-
LC ASC 27/45, [17] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated January 26,
1940
Violin acquiesces to applying for the job in St. Louis, despite reservations
about the climate there. He laments the backwardness of San Francisco's musical world. He
admits to being "kept" by his wife.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [18] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated January 29,
1940
Violin expresses pain that his wife has to do menial work to support them
both. He prefers not to apply for the St. Louis job because he feels Schoenberg was insulted
by Stuart's letter. He hopes to gain entrée to the performance world.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [19] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated February 12,
1940
Violin admits that he did not write to the St. Louis Institute of Music when
urged before, but has now done so. He wrote in English. — He reports the correspondence that
he brought with him from Vienna, and that which was lost or stolen on the
way.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [20] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated April 8, 1940
Violin makes an outraged critique of the rejection letter he has received from
R. E. Stuart. — His daughter, Eva, is now safely in San Francisco.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [21] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated June 8, 1940
Violin asks Schoenberg to write to Elizabeth Sprague Coolidge recommending him
to play with the Coolidge Quartet.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [22] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated October 23,
1940
Violin says that he is completely without work, but is not giving in to
despair.
-
LC ASC 27/45, [23] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schoenberg, dated December 19,
1940
In sending Christmas greetings, Violin tells Schoenberg that he heard his
Second Chamber Symphony [by radio] from New York. — He speaks of a course that he has been
hired to teach at the Jewish Center, and mentions a second possibility without divulging
details.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [10] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated January 27,
1940
Schoenberg reports a letter that he has received from R. E. Stuart. He detects
that Gottfried Galston will see him as a rival, so advises Violin to write stressing his
primary area as composition. He regrets that he can no longer avoid recommending some of his
own students.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [11] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated February 2,
1940
Schoenberg encloses a letter from St. Louis suggesting that Violin may be
under consideration for the vacant position [in composition], and checks whether Violin
possesses letters from Brahms. — He has written attempting to counter Galston's
influence.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [13] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated May 19
1940
Schoenberg asks whether Violin has received a letter from him with a copy of
his twelve-tone composition lecture.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [8] Typewritten letter (carbon copy) from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated January 16,
1940
Schoenberg informs Violin of a conversation he has had with [Robert Emmett]
Stuart about a position that is open [at the St. Louis Institute of Music] for which
Schoenberg would like to recommend him. He asks for the return of the general recommendation
he wrote for Violin earlier.
-
LC ASC 7/50, [9] Handwritten telegram draft from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated January 23,
1940
Schoenberg has wrongly addressed LC ASC 7/50, [8] and asks Violin to check
with the Post Office to recover the letter.
-
OJ 70/35, [7] Typewritten letter from Schoenberg to Moriz Violin, dated April 9, 1940
Schoenberg tempers Violin's reaction to R. E. Stuart's letter, offering a
sympathetic portrayal of the American character as courteous, unlike the Germans, and
describing the attitude and degree of preparation of American students. All German criteria
are inapplicable.
-
OJ 70/38, [1] Typewritten letter from R. E. Stuart to Moriz Violin, dated April 2, 1940
The St. Louis Institute of Music does not feel sure enough of Violin's being
given the position in the event of being interviewed, and so wishes to spare him the expense
of travel. It questions whether, as a recently arrived European, he would be able to adapt
to the staff and students.