-
CA 115 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated July 4, 1910
Schenker encloses manuscript of all prelims for Kontrapunkt 1. He mentions
recent publication of his edition of J. S. Bach's Chromatic Fantasy and Fugue, and speaks of
his plans for a Handbibliothek, for which he will present a proposal to Cotta. He announces
his departure and gives his summer address.
-
CA 116 Carbon copy of stenographically handwritten letter from Cotta to Schenker, dated July
6, 1910
Cotta acknowledges receipt of the manuscript prelims of Kontrapunkt 1 and
reiterates its request for material for its publicity blurb.
-
CA 118 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cotta, dated August 19, 1910
A fire at his hotel causes Schenker to ask whether Cotta has sent him final
proofs recently. — He inquires whether he might travel to Stuttgart to present his plan for
the Handbibliothek in person.
-
WSLB 119 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated June 5, 1912
Schenker inquires about the print-run and retail cost of his
Instrumentations-Tabelle, and points out an inconsistency in the edition number. He asks for
clarity on a payment he has just received, stressing his probity.
-
DLA 69.930/9 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated January 18, 1920
Schenker acknowledges receipt of OJ 11/35, 14 and 15, thanking Halm for the
opportunity to see the two contracts, now enclosed. Schenker has been exploited by UE regarding
EA 101 and the "Little Library," and must now protect himself and extract better working
conditions. —Kontrapunkt 2 will show the world that his "Semper idem" motto applies at every
level from strict counterpoint through to free composition. In a musical garden of Eden of
genius, the rest of the world behaves like Adam and Eve. — Schenker congratulates Halm on his
successes and thanks him for his support.
-
OJ 6/7, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 13, 1921
Schenker gives an account of the move into Keilgasse 8 and describes his study in
the apartment. He outlines his holiday plans, and explains how he is raising the fees for
lessons in the autumn.
-
OJ 10/1, [63] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated June 17, 1921
Dahms sends birthday greetings. — Cotta has turned down his book proposal. — He
will soon obtain a passport and hopes to visit the Schenkers during the summer.
-
OJ 15/16, [45] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated July 20, 1921
Weisse has completed a string quartet, the parts of which are being copied out,
after which the score will be sent to the leader of the Rosé Quartet. He has been recommended as
a music teacher in a school being set up in India by Rabindranath Tagore, but cannot accept
because his knowledge of English is insufficient. He enquires about the progress of Schenker's
current projects.
-
OJ 10/1, [65] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated August 21, 1921
Dahms is unable to visit the Schenkers in Galtür. — He criticizes Berlin and its
artists and critics.
-
OJ 14/45, [11] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated September 1, 1921
Violin announces the formation of a piano trio ensemble with a violinist named
Wolfsthal and the cellist Friedrich Buxbaum, inquires about the proposed edition of Handel's
keyboard works, and reports on the incipient civil unrest in the wake of a national movement in
Germany.
-
OJ 14/45, [105] Handwritten postcard from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated October 6, 1921
Violin acknowledges receipt of payment, inquires about reviews of Der
Tonwille.
-
OJ 10/1, [67] Handwritten postcard from Dahms to Schenker, dated October 12, 1921
Dahms reports on his Italian sojourn and work.
-
OJ 6/7, [2] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated January 29, 1922
Schenker offers to lend Violin his performing materials for two keyboard
concertos by C. P. E. Bach. He inquires about musical life in Hamburg, reports on his most
recent work, continues to despair of his financial situation.
-
OJ 10/3, [28] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated February 14, 1922
Deutsch offers to provide several books to Schenker instead of two or three hardback copies of the
"Moonlight" Sonata edition, and then details several misprints and factual errors in Romain Rolland's biography
of Beethoven.
-
OC 1B/10-11 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated February 22‒23, 1922
Schenker returns materials for the Fifth Symphony article, reports a delay in
providing information for the facsimile edition of the "Spring" Sonata, and complains that he
has futilely lavished time on the purification of the German language for the second edition of
Die letzten fünf Sonaten ... Op. 109. — He agrees in principle to Hertzka's idea of an
"Urlinie-Ausgabe" of the Beethoven sonatas, and agrees to announce it in Tonwille 2, but asks
how the first seventeen sonatas are to be done retrospectively, and rejects the suggestion that
his pupils might make the preparatory graphs.
-
OJ 6/7, [3] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 6, 1922
This wide-ranging letter describes the difficulties encountered with Emil Hertzka
at Universal Edition, concerning an attack on the music critic Paul Bekker planned for the
"Miscellanea" of Tonwille 2. — He expresses his displeasure with Weisse for putting his success
as a composer in the way of aiding his teacher's cause, and for exploiting his teacher's
generosity. — Ends with generous praise for Violin's musicianship.
-
OC B/145 Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Altmann to Schenker, dated September 25,
1922
Altmann has dispatched two items to Schenker, and asks Schenker to instruct UE
to send copies of Der Tonwille to the Preussische Staatsbibliothek.
-
OC B/143 Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Altmann to Schenker, dated October 9,
1922
Altmann acknowledges receipt of Der Tonwille and return of two editions, and
refers to Universal Edition.
-
OJ 6/7, [4] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated December 21, 1922
Schenker reports the imminent publication of Tonwille 3, and some new publishing
ventures, including a (new) edition of music by C. P. E. Bach and an "Urlinie Edition" of the
Short Preludes by J. S. Bach.
-
OJ 10/3, [39] Typewritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated December 29, 1922
Deutsch provides a full overview of Schenker income from the current sales reported by Universal
Edition of the "Moonlight" Sonata facsimile edition, and also his debts at Seidel's Book Dealership; Schenker
owes Deutsch 76.65 marks. Deutsch is dissatisfied with Universal Edition's behavior with respect to the
publication.
-
OJ 14/45, [20] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated February 6, 1923
Violin thanks Schenker for Tonwille 3 and reports on growing social unrest and
anti-French feeling in Germany.
-
OJ 11/2, [1] Handwritten letter from Emma Fischer to Schenker, dated February 15, 1923
Baroness Fischer responds to Schenker's plan for distribution of issues of Der
Tonwille by suggesting contacts in the Vienna music schools and professional
association.
-
OJ 11/2, [2] Handwritten letter from Emma Fischer to Schenker, dated February 23, 1923
Baroness Fischer gives names and addresses of five of her pupils to whom Der
Tonwille should be sent; she regrets that Schenker will not spread his theory further by
means of lectures.
-
OJ 6/7, [5] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 9,
1923
Having settled into country life in the Tyrol, Schenker returns to his work, in
particular to the ongoing battles with Hertzka over the publication of Der Tonwille. He asks
Violin’s opinion about a subscription plan for a periodical that would appear four times a year
(instead of the current two), and hopes that his friend might spare a few days to visit him in
Galtür.
-
OJ 14/45, [23] Handwritten lettercard from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated July 12, 1923
Violin writes approvingly of Schenker’s scheme to make Der Tonwille available by
subscription, as a periodical publication, and has a plan in mind. He inquires about the cost of
staying in Galtür.
-
OJ 14/45, [24] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Heinrich Schenker, dated July 14, 1923
Violin has met an industrialist by the name of Max Temming who would be willing
to help make Schenker’s work more widely accessible. Violin will probably not visit the
Schenkers in Galtür this summer, as prices have gone up in Germany.
-
OJ 15/16, [48] Handwritten letter from Hans and Hertha Weisse to Schenker, dated July 15, 1923
Weisse summarizes his recent travels in northern Italy and Switzerland, and
inquires about progress on Der freie Satz, a work which he thinks will be an indispensable
foundation for the analyses in Der Tonwille.
-
OJ 6/7, [6] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 20,
1923
Schenker describes his efforts to make Der Tonwille more widely read, through its
distribution by his pupils and its display in music shop windows. He needs more help from pupils
and friends with the dissemination of his work, but complains that Hans Weisse has let him down
on more than one occasion by not writing about his work. Finally, he asks Violin’s advice about
whether he should accept an invitation to speak at a conference in Leipzig, or whether he should
simply stay at home and continue to write.
-
OC 12/7-9 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker dated November 6‒10, 1923
Halm has sent the published score of a string quartet to Schenker. —Patronage has
enabled him to publish three volumes of compositions; reports on current and past composition
activities and publications. —Discusses what he has learned from Schenker's theories, and
questions whether it would be a fault were Bruckner's symphonies not to contain the Urlinie;
Halm's book on Bruckner's symphonies has gone into its second edition. —Halm suspects that
Schenker may not "agree with" his compositions, and asks whether Schenker wishes to receives
further scores. —Halm considers socialism a "historical necessity."
-
OJ 5/45, [3] Copy, in Jeanette Schenker's hand, of a letter from Schenker to Weisse, dated September
12, 1923
Schenker explains his behavior a few days before, in reply to Weisse’s letter of
September 7, and his implicit displeasure at his pupil's lengthy trip to Italy in the summer.
-
OJ 6/7, [7] Handwritten letter from Heinrich Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 21,
1923
In a wide-ranging letter, Schenker expresses his joy at Karl Violin’s improving
health, and goes on to mention a number of personal successes he has lately had, including a
visit from Paul von Klenau to take advice for a forthcoming performance of Beethoven’s Missa
solemnis. He has also had some unexpected support from his publisher, who wants to expand Der
Tonwille to a quarterly publication. He is planning to take part in a series of charity concerts
(three Haydn piano trios), and has heard that Clemens Kraus and Hans Knappertsbusch are
overtaking Furtwängler as conductors in Vienna by accepting more modest fees.
-
OJ 11/36, [8] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker dated October 22, 1923
Hammer buys all Schenker's publications, including Tonwille, but admits he has
difficulty understanding Schenker's Harmonielehre; — asks for loan of Halm's [Klavierübung]; —
gives his forthcoming dates;— comments on the lute and its tablature; — considers Busoni's
[Entwurf] wrong-headed.
-
JOB 94-3, [5] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated October 24, 1923
Schenker invites Hammer and his wife for November 7; — The problem of the
"middleman" (performer, etc.) in music, by contrast with painting; — he reports on Hertzka's
proposal to make Tonwille a quarterly publication.
-
OJ 11/36, [9] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker undated [October 25, 1923]
Hammer sympathizes with the composer's dilemma over middlemen, but points to
cases in which the painter has suffered a similar fate.
-
OJ 11/36, [11] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated January 5, 1923 [recte
1924]
Hammer refers to the making of a portrait; — he discusses German and Austrian art
with respect to Italian and French; — he comments favorably on Der Tonwille, but defends the art
of the French.
-
JOB 94-3, [7] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated January 13, 1924
Schenker responds to a long letter from Hammer by, first, agreeing to his
proposal to sittings for a portrait, and, second, saying that there is no one in music now
capable of judging the artistry of musicians. Schenker feels he has uniquely this ability,
but others in music do not understand him.
-
OJ 14/45, [30] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated February 5, 1924
Violin reports that Max Temming is keen to support his plan to promote Schenker's
work. Following discussions with Schenker in Vienna, he makes some provisional calculations on
how the gift of money would give Schenker more time to devote to his writings. He also thinks
about the happy prospect of Schenker coming to Hamburg.
-
OC 12/10-12 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker dated dated February 1–6, 1924
Halm offers to send two of his books in return for Schenker's Opp. 109, 110, 111;
he discusses the role of improvisation in his own music; he seeks "corporeality" in music, and
its absence in Brahms troubles him; argues the case for Bruckner; asks Schenker to choose a
passage exhibiting non-genius in his or Oppel's music and discuss it in Der
Tonwille.
-
OJ 6/7, [8] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 14, 1924
Schenker reports continuing trouble with Hertzka, especially over delays to the
publication of Tonwille 5 and 6, which were supposed to appear the previous year, and is
beginning to think about legal action. Hertzka has made his position so difficult that he feels
obliged to turn down Max Temming's offer of direct financial support for his work. He asks
Violin to help find a post in Hamburg for Carl Bamberger, a gifted pupil who, though he
neglected his piano studies for a while, is keen to make up for lost time. Finally, he asks if
Violin received any of the four volumes of the Beethoven piano sonata edition.
-
OJ 14/45, [31] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated March 16, 1924
Violin acknowledges receipt of Tonwille 5 and the Beethoven sonata edition. In
the former, he finds the graphs of the short preludes by Bach more difficult than anything that
Schenker has previously done. He will write to Bamberger with the offer of help (in finding an
accompanist post in Hamburg). In response to a question on the "Appassionata" Sonata from one of
his pupils, he offers an explanation for the falling direction of the transitional theme
(measures 24-30) and its reappearance in the development section (measures 94-100) in inverted,
ascending form; he asks if this interpretation is sensible.
-
DLA 69.930/12 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated April 3‒4, 1924
In response to matters raised by Halm in two previous letters, Schenker discusses
figuration, distinguishing between that which works only on the surface and that which arises
out of the middle and background, drawing on primal intervals. He also concedes that he heard
Bruckner improvising, and criticizes it adversely. He refers to Reger, and outlines plans for
forthcoming volumes of Der Tonwille.
-
OC 12/15-17 Handwritten letter from Halm to Schenker dated April 7, April 14, and May 6,
1924]
Halm again asks Schenker to point out an instance of non-genius in his [Halm's]
music. — Has long believed that foreground (= corporeality) has been neglected at the expense of
background (= spirituality) in music. — Defends Kurth against Schenker's critical remarks. —
Suggests an explanation for the Bruckner classroom incident. — Will send parts of his [A major]
String Quartet and promises a copy of his "Von Grenzen und Ländern". — Accepts offer of
assistance with publication costs. — Comments on Reger.
-
OC B/183 Typewritten postcard from Wilhelm Altmann to Schenker, dated June 12,
1924
The Library does not possess the autograph of J. S. Bach's Kleine
Präludien.
-
OJ 15/16, [52] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated August 28, 1924
Weisse is so absorbed in his work that he is unable to give Schenker a precise
number of subscribers to Der Tonwille among his circle of pupils. He will see Gerald Warburg
soon, but confesses that the latter felt hurt by Schenker’s article “The Mission of German
Genius.” — Weisse will devote much time to composition during the coming season, and for this
reason will forego taking further lessons from Schenker.
-
DLA 69.930/13 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated October 6, 1924
Asks Halm to send some of his chamber music to Rudolf Pollak, with prospect of
performance of the A major string quartet. —Deplores current situation over Sofie Deutsch
stipends. —Reports difficulties with UE and intention to change publisher.
-
OJ 9/12, [1] Handwritten letter from Carl Bamberger to Schenker, dated October 6, 1924
Bamberger writes of his pleasure at working in a theater, and his liking of
Danzig as a medieval city. He is studying Schenker's edition of the Beethoven sonatas, and
has ordered Harmonielehre and Kontrapunkt I and II. He is subscribing to Der Tonwille, and
is interesting one of his colleagues in Schenker's ideas. He inquires after two Schenker
pupils.
-
OJ 14/45, [35] Handwritten draft letter to Max Temming, in Schenker’s hand, dated October 10, 1924,
sent to Moriz Violin
In this draft letter to Max Temming, Schenker expresses his thanks for the
industrialist's financial support for the dissemination of Der Tonwille to university music
departments.
-
OJ 6/7, [9] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 16, 1924
After thanking Violin for his touching fiftieth-birthday tribute of 1918,
Schenker outlines plans for sending out copies of Der Tonwille: he has drawn up a list, which
Violin is free to edit. Like Violin, he has lost pupils recently, and so wants to concentrate
more on the dissemination of Der Tonwille, with a new publisher.
-
OJ 14/45, [36] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated October 22, 1924
In the process of arranging for copies of Der Tonwille to be distributed, Violin
discovers that a pupil of his paid twice as much for one issue as the marked price in Austria.
He has made some inquiries into this matter, and asks Schenker what an issue currently costs in
Austria. There are no respectable music institutions in Hamburg, so Violin will distribute
copies there personally.
-
OJ 6/7, [10] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated October 26, 1924
Schenker names ten universities that should receive complimentary copies of Der
Tonwille, explaining that university music departments (Seminare) are more suitable recipients
than conservatories and other types of music schools. With 1924 coming to an end, he will resign
from UE and shift publication of Der Tonwille to Piper or Drei-Masken Verlag in Munich. The
latter have agreed to publish his study of Beethoven's Sonata Op. 106
-
OJ 6/7, [11] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 6, 1924
Schenker has received a photographic reproduction of the opening chorus of Bach's
St Matthew Passion. — Gives account of delays to the publication of Tonwille 8/9 and 10, blaming
Hertzka for being slow to send work to the engraver, and has written to him with a request to
dissolve the Tonwille contract with UE. — Refers to a recent review by (Julius) Korngold, and
recounts a long story about his piano dealer, Bernhard Kohn.
-
OJ 6/7, [12] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 8, 1924
Hearing that Violin is unwell, Schenker wishes his friend a speedy recovery. —
Encloses a draft of a letter to the university music departments chosen to be given copies of
Der Tonwille. — Recounts a story according to which Eusebius Mandyczewski prevented distribution
of complimentary copies of Der Tonwille to needy scholars.
-
OJ 6/7, [13] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated November 13, 1924
Schenker sends Violin Jeanette's handwritten copy of the essay Violin had
composed for Schenker's fiftieth birthday in 1918, and hopes that it may one day be published. —
Has received a conciliatory letter from Hertzka, but is determined to move Der Tonwille to a
Munich publisher.
-
OC 54/2 Typed letter from Alfred Einstein & August Demblin (DMV) to Schenker, dated
November 27, 1924
Having had soundings from Otto Vrieslander about taking over the publishing of
Der Tonwille, Drei Masken Verlag now approach Schenker directly, asking him to come to an
agreement with Universal Edition about the the future of the publication.
-
OC 54/5-7 Draft letter from Schenker to Drei Masken Verlag, dated as sent on December 9,
1924
In the light of an exchange of letters with UE, Schenker suggests that the new
publication have a new title (Die Urlinie) but that the old typeface and format be retained.
He suggests that the new periodical should include articles on each of the Chopin etudes and
the four Brahms symphonies, and on symphonies by Beethoven, Mozart, Schubert and Haydn, from
all of which book-length studies could subsequently be made.
-
OC 54/8 Postal receipt for a letter from Schenker to Drei Masken Verlag, dated December 9,
1924
Postal receipt for OC 54/5-7.
-
OJ 14/45, [39] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated December 10, 1924
This somewhat cryptic letter, possibly relating to a subscription order for Der
Tonwille, was sent with an enclosure that required some interpretation or action on the part of
Schenker. Violin also reports that the music department at the University of Berlin has
received, with gratitude, the copies of Der Tonwille.
-
OC 54/10 Typed letter from Theodor Baumgarten to Schenker, dated January 15, 1925
Baumgarten expresses his concerns about Schenker’s negotiations with a new
publisher, and cautiously advises that his client might instead wish to reach a peaceful
agreement with Universal Edition.
-
OJ 14/45, [41] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated January 19, 1925
Violin reports on a successful concert in which he performed both as a soloist
and with the Klingler String Quartet. He thanks Schenker for Tonwille 10. He has received a copy
of Hans Weisse’s recent vocal quartets, and is puzzled by how a limited talent can write such
good music. He is going to see Max Temming, and has received four courteous letters of
acknowledgement from university music departments for copies of Der Tonwille.
-
OC 54/12 Typed letter from August Demblin and Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated January
20, 1925
Drei Masken Verlag offer to publish Schenker's future work as a yearbook,
entitled "Das Meisterwerk in der Musik," in volumes comprising fifteen gatherings (180 pages).
The manuscript would need to be delivered in July in order for the book to be published in time
for Christmas.
-
OJ 15/15, [17] Handwritten postcard from Weisse to Schenker, dated January 22, 1925
Weisse alerts Schenker to the January 1925 issue of Die Musik, which contains two
pieces concerned with him. He suggests that Schenker travel to Munich, to negotiate a deal with
Alfred Einstein at Drei Masken-Verlag concerning the publication of a successor to Der
Tonwille.
-
OJ 6/7, [17] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 2, 1925
Schenker, repeating some of the points made in earlier letters, continues to give an account of
Hertzka's dishonest dealings with him over Der Tonwille and asks Violin to give him an accurate count of the
subscriptions that Max Temming paid for in the distribution of free copies of the journal to university music
departments. He asks if Violin suspects that anti-Semitism lurks behind some of the critical notices of his recent
concert. Finally, he mentions an article in Die Musik by Paul Bekker that numbers Schenker among the hermeneutists;
the same issue contains a review of Der Tonwille, by Max Broesicke-Schon, disputing the supreme genius of the
canonic composers.
-
OC 52/647 Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated February 5, 1925
Violin explains why, and how, the number of free copies of Der Tonwille
distributed to German university music departments was reduced from 10 per university to 7.
He has seen Paul Bekker's recent book, which includes a survey of recent trends in music
theory.
-
OC 54/20-22 Draft of a letter from Schenker to Drei Masken Verlag, dated February 7,
1925
Schenker agrees to the terms of a contract outlined by Drei Masken Verlag. He
requests that Fraktur typeface be used in the printing of his Yearbook, and he also needs to
know the likely dimensions of the book (in words per page) so that he can plan its contents
accordingly. He ends with a diatribe against Emil Hertzka at Universal
Edition.
-
OC 52/639 Handwritten letter from Siegfried Fritz Müller to Schenker, dated February 13,
1925
Siegfried Fritz Müller reports his subscriptions to Tonwille and asks for
clarity regarding dealings with Drei Masken-Verlag.
-
OJ 9/12, [2] Handwritten letter from Carl Bamberger to Schenker, dated February 18,
1925
Bamberger reports that after six months of repetiteur work he has been granted
some conducting. -- He laments the lack of musical education of the Danzig citizens, and its
impact on the theater's repertory. Talent is not appreciated by the theater's
administrators. He wants to move on from Danzig, suggesting Dessau. -- He reports on his
reading of Der Tonwille, and his success in encouraging others to subscribe. -- He asks
Schenker a question about Schubert's song "Wohin?"
-
OC 52/636 Handwritten letter from Robert Brünauer to Schenker, dated February 19,
1925
Robert Brünauer reports on the subscriptions to Der Tonwille that he has taken
out.
-
OJ 6/7, [18] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated February 22, 1925
Schenker thanks Violin for his recent letter (and enclosure), which contains
evidence of Hertzka's false calculations of subscriptions to Der Tonwille – this letter in stark
contrast to the actions of his pupils Weisse and Brünauer, who had given more support to the
publication of Weisse's recently published vocal quartets than to his writings. Leaving Der
Tonwille behind, which has earned him little money and caused him much misery, he has written a
lengthy study of Bach's solo violin works, which will be published in the first volume of Das
Meisterwerk in der Musik, which will include a critique of Ernst Kurth's Grundlagen des linearen
Kontrapunkts.
-
OJ 9/12, [3] Handwritten letter from Carl Bamberger to Schenker, dated February 23,
1925
As a follow-up to his previous letter, Bamberger gives a full account of the
number of subscriptions to Der Tonwille that he has either instigated himself or encouraged
others to take on.
-
OJ 11/36, [17] Handwritten letter from Hammer to Schenker, dated March 1, 1925
Hammer describes his travels and work in the past eight months, and compares the
piano playing of Otto Vrieslander with that of Schenker.
-
OC 54/28 Typed letter from August Demblin and Alfred Einstein (DMV) to Schenker, dated March 3,
1925
Drei Masken Verlag is willing to use Der Tonwille as the title of Schenker's
Yearbook, but only with the approval of Hertzka at Universal Edition.
-
JOB 94-3, [10] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hammer dated March 12, 1925
Wherever Hammer may travel, Schenker declares, he will never lose his
Germanness. Schenker asserts the superiority post-WWI of the German nation over those of the
west. -- He describes his own pianism: his "fingers are like musical brains." -- He gives an
account of the dispute with Universal Edition and the outcome of negotiations with Drei
Masken Verlag.
-
OC B/196 Typewritten letter from Wilhelm Altmann to Schenker, dated March 24, 1925
The St. Matthew Passion parts may be retained until mid-July; Altmann is
pleased at Schenker's move from Universal Edition to Drei Masken Verlag; will not be in
Galtür next summer.
-
OJ 6/7, [19] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated April 10, 1925
Continuing the story of the ongoing financial battle against Hertzka and
Universal Edition, Schenker thanks Violin for providing confirmation of the subscriptions paid
for by Max Temming, then recounts that, at a meeting with Hertzka and his bookkeeper, the
order-book for Der Tonwille had several pages torn out. Schenker is upset that his lawyer Dr.
Baumgarten, though an old friend, is not fully supportive of his position and would prefer seek
a compromise with Hertzka; this, Schenker feels, would rob him of much of his hard-earned
royalties, especially from the Beethoven sonata edition. He now asks Violin to find a contact –
outside Hamburg – who would be willing to order nine copies of Tonwille 1, as evidence that this
issue is still in demand, despite Hertzka's claims to the contrary. He has attended a
performance of Hans Weisse's Sextet, of which he found the variation movement and the trio
section of the scherzo to be the most satisfactory parts.
-
OJ 6/7, [20] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 4, 1925
In a wide-ranging letter, Schenker sends Violin money for arranging the order of
Der Tonwille (which must consist of multiple copies of Tonwille 1); Hertzka's representative,
Robert Scheu, is currently studying the papers relating to Schenker's threat of legal action.
Schenker continues to express his astonishment at Furtwängler's ignorance of sonata form, a fact
that does not prevent him from earning huge fees for conducting in New York. He has turned down
a request from a lady who teaches in New York and a former pupil (now in St. Gallen), who wish
to spend some time with him in Galtür. He enquires about the personal difficulties that Violin
writes about in his letter, and asks him to say more; they will invite his sister for a visit.
He will send him a copy of the medallion (designed by Alfred Rothberger); the portrait by Viktor
Hammer is not yet finished.
-
OJ 6/7, [21] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated May 16, 1925
Making preparations with his solicitor for the legal action against Universal
Edition, Schenker asks Violin to find out whether Max Temming paid for the additional
subscriptions to Der Tonwille directly through Albert Gutmann in Vienna, or through the firm of
Hofmeister in Leipzig. He is nearing completion of the contents of the first Meisterwerk
yearbook and asks Violin whether he has yet made summer plans and whether these might include a
trip to Galtür.
-
OC 52/618 Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated May 26, 1925
Dealing at the same time with a family matter, Violin sends Schenker the
receipt for Max Temming's purchase of subscriptions to Der Tonwille and confirms that the
money for this was sent to the Leipzig office of Universal Edition. He is not planning any
summer holiday this year.
-
OJ 14/45, [43] Handwritten letter from Moriz Violin to Schenker, dated June 4, 1925
Violin thanks Schenker for sending him the small version of the medallion
designed by Alfred Rothberger. He does not want to give an account of the difficult times he
is facing, expecting that things will eventually turn out for the better. He returns some
money, left over from the purchase of copies of Tonwille 10, which Schenker had previously
sent him.
-
OJ 8/4, [37] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 9, 1925
Schenker asks Violin to write to one of the German university music
departments who received subscriptions to Der Tonwille through the generosity of Max
Temming, to find out if, and when, they received Tonwille 10, which was published in
January. He reports being on the verge of completing the first Meisterwerk
Yearbook.
-
OC 52/631 Handwritten letter from Elias to Heinrich Schenker, dated June 13, 1925
Miss Elias reports on the pricing of issues of Der Tonwille in two music
stores.
-
OJ 8/4, [38] Handwritten postcard from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated June 22, 1925
Schenker thanks Violin for his most recent efforts concerning the
subscriptions to Der Tonwille; he is astonished to learn that Tonwille 10, published in
January 1925, did not reach some subscribers until June. He hopes that Violin will be able
to visit him in the Tyrol this summer, as he is expecting Vrieslander with his
son.
-
OJ 6/7, [23] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Moriz Violin, dated July 26, 1925
Two weeks after arriving in Galtür for the summer holidays, Schenker reports that
he has caught up on his sleep and has already dictated an essay on Reger's Variations and Fugue
on a Theme of J. S. Bach, Op. 81. He will not allow the legal wrangle with Universal Edition to
interfere with his holiday, but he is annoyed about not having been paid by Drei Masken Verlag
for the manuscript of Meisterwerk 1. He has responded to a critique of his Erläuterungsausgabe
of Op. 110, in an essay in Meisterwerk 1, but will not pursue other attacks upon his work and
those of his pupils. The Schenker medallion designed by Alfred Rothberger is going to a second
impression; but the mezzotint portrait by Viktor Hammer, which Jeanette finds a superior work,
has not yet been printed. Throughout the letter, Schenker urges Violin to bring his family to
Galtür sometime during the summer.
-
OJ 9/12, [5] Handwritten letter from Carl Bamberger to Schenker, dated September 27,
1925
Bamberger is officially a "conductor" at Danzig. -- He asks how to obtain a
Rothberger medallion of Schenker and inquires after Hammer's etching. -- He reports on
Hupka's progress in Cologne, and inquires after F.E. von Cube.
-
OJ 15/15, [19] Handwritten letter from Weisse to Schenker, dated October 7, 1925
Weisse asks Schenker to look at some suitable frames for Hammer's portrait of
him. He reports that several autograph manuscripts of Brahms are being put up for sale, of
which that of the cadenzas Brahms wrote for Beethoven's Fourth Concerto are particularly
interesting. He quotes from a letter by Gerald Warburg, indicating that Schenker's latest
theoretical concepts are being taught at Damrosch's music school in New
York.
-
OC 54/62 Typed letter from Alfred Böhme (DMV) to Schenker, dated February 3, 1926
The Vienna branch of Drei Masken Verlag are forwarding Schenker’s request for an
announcement about the Meisterwerk Yearbooks to their Munich office. They explain that
difficulties in printing the music examples have delayed the production of Yearbook
1.
-
OC 52/545 Typed postcard from Hugo Winter (UE) to Schenker, dated April 9, 1926
Winter acknowledges order from Otto Bauer.
-
OC 54/75 Typed letter from DMV to Schenker, dated April 24, 1926
Drei Masken Verlag will send Schenker new page-proofs for the first gathering, to
ensure that the title-page and the list of printing errors are correct. They also ask about the
binding of the separate pages of musical illustration, and the notice about his earlier
publications.
-
OC 54/76 Typed letter from Alfred Böhme (DMV) to Schenker, dated May 4, 1926
Drei Masken Verlag are sending Schenker the proofs for the first gathering of
his first Meisterwerk Yearbook, with the list of printing errors. There is not enough room
for a special notice about the new series, but they will include the contents of the ten
issues of Der Tonwille.
-
OC 54/77 Typed letter from Alfred Böhme (DMV) to Schenker, dated May 7, 1926
Drei Masken Verlag alert Schenker to the printing error in the proof of
the advertisement page, which was to be included in the first Meisterwerk volume, and ask that
he disregard the imprimatur. They send linen swatches for the cover and recommend using coloured
lettering for the title.
-
OJ 10/1, [94] Handwritten letter from Dahms to Schenker, dated June 26, 1926
Dahms thanks Schenker for his report [on the viability of the almanach
proposal]. — He plans to devote part of the almanach to Beethoven, and asks whether Schenker
might contribute something new, or grant permission to reprint some of what he has written
in Der Tonwille.
-
OC 54/96-99 Draft of a letter from Schenker to Drei Masken Verlag in Jeanette Schenker’s hand
with corrections in Heinrich Schenker’s hand, dated July 14, 1926
Schenker agrees to a delay to the start of production of the second
Meisterwerk volume, but insists that it continue to be understood as a “Yearbook,” i.e. as
part of a series of publications and not as an individual book, and that it bear the year
1926.
-
OC 54/105-106 Draft of a letter from Schenker to Drei Masken Verlag in Jeanette Schenker’s hand,
dated November 18, 1926
Schenker reminds the publishers once again that they owe him a decision about
starting production of the second Meisterwerk Yearbook; although they have complained about
poor sales, they have done nothing to publicize the book, which would otherwise be unknown
to his adherents in foreign countries.
-
OC 54/108 Typed letter from Alfred Böhme (DMV) to Schenker, dated November 26, 1926
Drei Masken Verlag are not at liberty to make a direct approach to a
retailer’s customers. They suggest that Schenker contact the firm of Gutmann directly, and
that the appeal to his readers is personally composed; they will offer Gutmann a reduction
in the cost of copies ordered or sold by the firm.
-
OC 52/908 Typed letter from Hugo Winter (UE) to Schenker, dated December 28, 1926
Payments for Beethoven sonatas and Der Tonwille have been transferred.
-
OC 54/113-115 Handwritten notes by Schenker for material sent to Otto Erich Deutsch in January
1927.
These notes form the basis of a letter from Schenker to Otto Erich Deutsch
that gives details of his difficulties with his present publisher (Drei Masken Verlag), and
provides a list of the extracts from the correspondence with DMV, which Jeanette Schenker
has copied out to assist Deutsch in renegotiating a contract to publish Schenker’s second
Meisterwerk Yearbook.
-
OC 54/137 Typed letter from Otto Erich Deutsch to Schenker, dated March 16, 1927
Deutsch returns part of the proofs of the second Meisterwerk Yearbook and
provides bibliographical details of a Haydn sketch-leaf to be reproduced for the essay on
“The Representation of Chaos.”
-
DLA 69.930/15 Handwritten letter from Schenker to Halm, dated July 11, 1927
Thanking Halm for his Beethoven book, he believes that their misunderstandings
could be removed and hopes Der freie Satz will help bring that about; gives order of publication
for Meisterwerk II and Der freie Satz, and compares his "Das Organische der Fuge" with the work
of others on Bach. — Schenker took no part in the Vienna Beethoven festival. — Describes his
correspondence with Hindemith.
-
OJ 11/54, [18] Handwritten letter from van Hoboken to Schenker, dated September 18, 1927
Van Hoboken reports on his visit to John Petrie Dunn: his career, his grasp of
Schenker's theory, his situation at Edinburgh University, his publications. — Tomorrow he is to
visit C. S. Terry.
-
OC 52/844 Typed letter from Ernst Roth (UE) to Schenker, dated December 19, 1927
Roth announces that UE has stitched stocks of Der Tonwille issues together to
form three year-volumes.
-
WSLB 392 Handwritten letter from Schenker to UE, dated December 21, 1927
Schenker thanks UE for its promotion of Der Tonwille.
-
OC 52/910 Typed letter from Hugo Winter (UE) to Schenker, dated December 29, 1927
Announces that Schenker's 1927 royalty has been transferred.
-
WSLB 395 Handwritten postcard from Schenker to UE, dated April 25, 1928
Schenkers asks for the Tonwille volumes to be sent to Julius
Gold.
-
OC 52/911 Typed letter from Hugo Winter (UE) to Schenker, dated April 27, 1928
Encloses invoice for sending Der Tonwille to San Francisco.
-
OJ 5/7a, [14] (formerly vC 14) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, dated April 29, 1928
Schenker sympathizes with Cube over the hostilities he faces; contrasts his own theory to the
approach of Riemann. Has arranged for Hammer portraits to be sent to Cube [for bookshop exhibits], and directs him
to biographical information about himself. Describes the trials of his 20s, which were surpassed by the difficulties
he faced later with publishers and organizations. Upholds Joachim and Messchaert as models of performance art, and
speaks of his contact with Brahms. Asks whether Cube will be joining him in Galtür in the summer.
-
OJ 89/2, [6] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Hoboken, dated June 22, 1928
With thanks for birthday greetings, Schenker expresses how highly he values the
Photogrammarchiv while endorsing van Hoboken's turning down of an "honor" that he was offered. —
Schenker has, at Einstein's request, updated his entry in Riemann's Musiklexikon. — With the
success of the Urlinie through Der Tonwille, he no longer considers himself isolated.
-
OJ 9/34, [13] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated July 6, 1928
Cube reports on Scheuermann exhibit, and consequent interest and sales, encloses
associated newspaper article; also on recent lecturing and composition activity. He is unlikely
to visit Schenker this year; recalls people at Galtür.
-
WSLB 400 Handwritten letter (in Jeanette's hand) from Schenker to Hertzka (UE), dated
November 27, 1928
Schenker reports the impact of his Urlinie concept on the educational world
within Germany and in the USA. — He seeks to re-establish a working relationship with UE,
raising the cases of his unfinished elucidatory edition of Beethoven Op. 106, the analytical
study of the "Eroica" Symphony on which he is now working, and Der freie Satz, vol. III of
NMTF, still outstanding. — He is angling retroactively for a monograph series comprising his
existing studies of the Ninth and Fifth Symphonies and his forthcoming study of the
"Eroica."
-
OC 52/915 Typed letter from Hugo Winter (UE) to Schenker, dated December 27, 1928
Announces that Schenker's 1928 royalty has been transferred.
-
OJ 10/3, [105] Handwritten letter from Deutsch to Schenker, dated August 21, 1929
In this long letter, Deutsch seeks to explain Vrieslander’s behavior with
regard to the purchase of materials from an unscrupulous antiquarian dealer, and also to
account for Hoboken’s treatment of Vrieslander as a consequence. --- He accepts that funds
to set up a journal linked to the Photogram Archive are not unlimited, but understands why
Schenker cannot devote as much of his own time to the project as Hoboken might expect. ---
He describes Hoboken as a childish character, with little understanding of the world of
ordinary people, who might nevertheless ultimately produce a good piece of
scholarship.
-
OJ 10/3, [109] Typewritten picture postcard from Deutsch to Schenker, dated October 14,
1929
Deutsch agrees that there should be momentum associated with the Photogram
Archive, but Haas can probably not be persuaded [to approve of Hoboken’s taking the
editorial duties]. --- He reports that work on Haydn (with Hoboken) has
resumed.
-
OJ 6/7, [45] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated December 23, 1929
Schenker, expressing misgivings about the medical profession, nonetheless
hopes that Karl Violin's impending operation is successful. He is still awaiting news about
a publisher for the "Eroica" monograph; Furtwängler's illness has delayed some lines of
enquiry, and Hertzka (at Universal Edition) has not been cooperative.
-
OC 54/221 Letter from Waldheim-Eberle to Schenker, dated February 13, 1930
Cost estimate of production costs for the third Meisterwerk
yearbook.
-
OC 54/237 Typewritten letter from Drei Masken Verlag to Schenker, dated October 8,
1930
Drei Masken Verlag say the printers cannot be held responsible for mistakes in
the page-proofs and layout of the third Meisterwerk yearbook that Schenker failed to note in
the galley-proofs. A new set of page-proofs will be issued, and the last section of the book
will be repaginated.
-
OC 52/862 Invoice from UE to Schenker, dated October 10, 1930
Invoice for Tonwille sent to the Kiel Hochschule students.
-
OJ 13/25, [13] Typewritten postcard from Rinn to Schenker, dated December 5, [1930]
Rinn has extracted "aphorisms" from the three Meisterwerk volumes and sent the
page-proofs to Otto Vrieslander. — He would like to see the Tonwille pamphlets, with a view
to reprinting some of its articles.
-
WSLB 424 Handwritten letter from Schenker to UE, dated December 8, 1930
Schenker requests that a full set of Tonwille issues be sent to Hermann
Rinn.
-
OC 52/866 Typewritten postcard from Alfred Kalmus (UE) to Schenker, dated December 10,
1930
UE has sent a complimentary copy of Der Tonwille to Hermann
Rinn.
-
OJ 6/8, [1] Handwritten letter from Schenker to Violin, dated January 9, 1931
In this long and wide-ranging two-part letter, which includes a graphic
analysis of J. S. Bach’s Two-part Invention in E-flat major, Schenker praises the work of
Hans Weisse, who has recently returned from lecturing in Berlin and may be offered a post
there (on Furtwängler’s recommendation), emigrate to America (with the help of Gerald
Warburg), or even found an institute that would give employment to Felix Salzer and other
Schenkerian disciples under one roof. — A letter from Violin, which has just arrived in the
morning post, speaks of Violin’s own intention to establish a Schenker Institute in Hamburg.
For this, Schenker recommends Felix-Eberhard von Cube (in preference to Reinhard Oppel) and
Otto Vrieslander as possible theory teachers, if not Weisse himself. — The letter concludes
with a tirade against those who have caused him financial misery (including his brother
Mozio), culminating in a cynical passage in which Schenker advises his friend to look after
himself and engage some dull pedagog to teach conventional theory. In the end, he wishes
Violin luck with the enterprise, and thanks him for having helped rescue him from Hertzka’s
clutches.
-
OJ 12/6, [8] Handwritten postcard from Jonas to Schenker, dated March 30, [1931]
Jonas thanks Schenker for OJ 5/18, 4; — reports that his own essay and a review
of Das Meisterwerk III will appear in the Zeitschrift für Musikwissenschaft; — asks question
about a discussion in Der Tonwille of a Bach fugue copied out by Beethoven.
-
OJ 5/7a, [38] (formerly vC 38) Handwritten letter from Schenker to Cube, in Jeanette Schenker's hand, dated June 30, 1931
Schenker encloses the [Mozart calling] card, and sends an article from Der Kunstwart; he
emphasizes that Moriz Violin's new institute is a "school," not a "seminar," and offers detailed advice;
comments that his theory from Harmonielehre to Meisterwerk constitutes a self-contained whole; recommends use of
C. P. E. Bach's Versuch with his theory applied to the examples; and foretells the Urlinie-Tafeln that should be
available to Violin/Cub in Hamburg and to Weisse in New York. His eyes have suffered and need complete
rest.
-
OJ 9/34, [28] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 16, 1931
Cube reports enrollment and quality of students at the Schenker Institute,
Hamburg; his own teaching is increasingly small-group-tuition based, drawing on Tonwille and
Meisterwerk. Karl Violin is recovering.
-
OJ 5/11, [1b] Second draft of a handwritten letter from Schenker to Furtwängler in Jeanette and
Heinrich Schenker’s hand, dated November 11‒16, 1931
-
OJ 15/16, [90] Handwritten letter from Hans Weisse to Schenker, dated March 17, 1933
Weisse reports the success of his lecture on the C minor prelude from the
Well-Tempered Clavier, Book 1. — He is currently giving two lectures on a Haydn's sonata. —
He inquires about the possibility of having Schenker's foreground graphs for the "Eroica"
Symphony printed separately and sold to his pupils, for a series of lectures planned for the
following year; the profits entirely to Schenker. — He sees little prospect visiting Europe
in the summer, as his financial situation has worsened: the Mannes School has been forced to
reduce his teaching for the next season. — He expresses his doubts about Vrieslander's
ability to reshape Schenker's Harmonielehre as a school textbook, and about the value of
Harmonielehre itself in the light of his teacher's most advanced theoretical
ideas.
-
OC 18/36 Typewritten letter from Arthur Waldeck to Schenker, dated June 3, 1934
After the failure of his initiative to fund a translation of Harmonielehre,
Waldeck tells Schenker of his plan to coauthor with Nathan Broder an article introducing
Schenker's theory [to English-speaking readers].
-
OJ 9/34, [42] Handwritten letter from Cube to Schenker, dated October 4, 1934
Quotes letter from Furtwängler in extenso touching on reasons for dismissal and
articulating the importance of Schenker's theory; Cube describes the impact of this letter on his
Director. The names of Schenker, Halm, and Kurth were deleted from a recent text of his, and
censorship has been imposed. Describes his own recent activities. Outlines his geometric theory of the
diatonic components of tonality. Encloses photograph of his wife and son; describes hardships. Denies
rumors that he has cheated Moriz Violin, and refers to the resulting backlash on him: Violin has a
"complex", feels downtrodden by everyone.